Today's hottest deals

Asus P8H61-M LE/USB3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics39.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive23.9% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus P8H61-M LE/USB3  (all builds)
Memory2.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130918
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 21 '20 at 21:56
Run Duration120 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-2120-$100
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
65.8% Good
Memory 93
1-Core 85.3
2-Core 145
67% 108 Pts
4-Core 226
8-Core 226
30% 226 Pts
64-Core 226
14% 226 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 65.8%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
MSI(1462 3201) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1612 MHz, MLim: 1940 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 442.74
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
39.9% Below average
Lighting 51.9
Reflection 50.3
Parallax 44.8
42% 49 fps
MRender 43
Gravity 45.5
Splatting 40.9
35% 43.1 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 39.9%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 240GB-$23
184GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR013
SusWrite @10s intervals: 203 199 84 89 129 125 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
23.9% Poor
Read 216
Write 200
Mixed 10
SusWrite 138
31% 141 MB/s
4K Read 6.9
4K Write 4.6
4K Mixed 6.9
22% 6.13 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 23.9%
Great: 92%
Seagate ST3250312AS 250GB-$59
233GB free
Firmware: HP64
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 118 114 119 118 117 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
65.6% Good
Read 112
Write 45.2
Mixed 53
SusWrite 116
60% 81.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
164% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 65.6%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-025.A00LF 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
30.2% Below average
MC Read 9.7
MC Write 9.4
MC Mixed 8.8
27% 9.3 GB/s
SC Read 9
SC Write 10
SC Mixed 9
27% 9.33 GB/s
Latency 62.2
64% 62.2 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 30.2%
Great: 30%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8H61-M LE/USB3 Builds (Compare 658 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H61-M LE/USB3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $65
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback