Today's hottest deals

Koloe X58

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics4.08% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemIntel Thurley
MotherboardKoloe X58  (all builds)
Memory6.2 GB free of 6.00098 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170331
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 22 '20 at 20:26
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5606
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.15 GHz, turbo 2.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
60.3% Good
Memory 84.3
1-Core 47
2-Core 108
51% 79.8 Pts
4-Core 213
8-Core 213
28% 213 Pts
64-Core 214
13% 214 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 60.3%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro FX 1800
Nvidia(10DE 062C) 768MB
Ram: 768MB, Driver: 341.74
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
4.08% Terrible
Lighting 5.03
Reflection 7.12
Parallax 1.66
4% 4.6 fps
MRender 7.19
Gravity 3.5
Splatting 4.43
4% 5.04 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.08%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung HD320KJ 320GB
261GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CP100-12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 67 67 70 64 66 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
41.6% Average
Read 77.8
Write 79.2
Mixed 46.6
SusWrite 66.9
50% 67.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.9
149% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 41.6%
Great: 45%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 18KSF25672PDZ1G4F1 18KSF25672PDZ1G4F1 18KSF25672PDZ1G4F1 MXIC 25L8005 39GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 33 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 33792 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
33.2% Below average
MC Read 13
MC Write 9.1
MC Mixed 11
32% 11 GB/s
SC Read 9.3
SC Write 8.5
SC Mixed 8.9
25% 8.9 GB/s
Latency 72.9
55% 72.9 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 33.2%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X58 Builds (Compare 517 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Koloe X58

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Excellent Total price: $84
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $78
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback