Medion Erazer X5398 E/B528

Performance Results


Gaming 32% Sail boat	Desktop 71% Battleship	Workstation 24% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	46.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	43.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Medion Erazer X5398 E/B528 (all builds)
Motherboard	MEDION MS-7848
Memory	6 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20141106
Uptime	1 Days
Run Date	Mar 23 '20 at 13:48
Run Duration	129 Seconds
Run User	BEL-User
Background CPU	27%

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4460-$194 245,403 User benchmarks, average bench 62% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	66.5% Good	Memory 82.2 1-Core 81.8 2-Core 139 62% 101 Pts	4-Core 304 8-Core 248 38% 276 Pts	64-Core 239 15% 239 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 66.5% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200 834,238 User benchmarks, average bench 49% Elitegroup(1019 1029) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 442.74 Performing below potential (37^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	46.7% Average	Lighting 58.4 Reflection 62.6 Parallax 56.8 48% 59.3 fps	MRender 60.3 Gravity 56.3 Splatting 50 45% 55.5 fps
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 46.7% Great: 54%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7LF128HCHP-00000 128GB 1,148 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 60GB free (System drive) Firmware: FXT0101Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 43 40 42 42 41 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	43.6% Average	Read 431 Write 48.7 Mixed 84.5 SusWrite 42.4 32% 152 MB/s	4K Read 20.3 4K Write 13.4 4K Mixed 19.6 63% 17.8 MB/s	DQ Read 162 DQ Write 21.6 DQ Mixed 28.2 37% 70.6 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 43.6% Great: 61%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$49 170,877 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 1TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 132 129 129 134 132 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	82.6% Excellent	Read 157 Write 140 Mixed 92.3 SusWrite 131 96% 130 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 1.1 210% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 82.6% Great: 84%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown M2F8G64CB8HD5N-DI 1311 M2F4G64CB88D7N-DI 12GB 40 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 4096 MB Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	32% Below average	MC Read 7.6 MC Write 11.9 MC Mixed 11 29% 10.2 GB/s	SC Read 8.6 SC Write 14.3 SC Mixed 9.4 31% 10.8 GB/s	Latency 76.6 52% 76.6 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 32% Great: 52%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Erazer X5398 E/B528 Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 33%

Sail boat

Desktop 71%

Battleship

Workstation 25%

Raft

System: Medion Erazer X5398 E/B528

CPU
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples	1x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	1x

SSD
MZ7LF128HCHP-00000 128GBSamsungBench 48%, 1,148 samples	1x

RAM
M2F8G64CB8HD5N-DI 1311 M2F4G64CB88D7N-DI 12GBUnknownBench 43%, 40 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 63% - Good

Total price: $394

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $23	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16