Lenovo 4294CTO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.13% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive41.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 4294CTO  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 4294CTO
Memory3.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160218
Uptime1.8 Days
Run DateMar 25 '20 at 15:07
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2620M
CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
59.9% Above average
Memory 83.3
1-Core 87.4
2-Core 152
65% 108 Pts
4-Core 213
8-Core 213
28% 213 Pts
64-Core 212
13% 212 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 59.9%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)
Legend(17AA 21DB) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
2.13% Terrible
Lighting 2.43
Reflection 3.12
Parallax 1.62
2% 2.39 fps
MRender 2.57
Gravity 1.17
Splatting 4.52
2% 2.75 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.13%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial M4 256GB-$218
142GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 04MH
SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 173 195 146 152 153 MB/s
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
41.9% Average
Read 227
Write 182
Mixed 185
SusWrite 165
43% 190 MB/s
4K Read 14.5
4K Write 39.5
4K Mixed 12.8
59% 22.3 MB/s
DQ Read 117
DQ Write 107
DQ Mixed 23.4
42% 82.7 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 41.9%
Great: 74%
Hitachi HTS723232A7A364 320GB
294GB free
Firmware: EC2ZB70B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 94 95 95 95 95 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
49.7% Average
Read 78.5
Write 81.5
Mixed 43.8
SusWrite 94.6
55% 74.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
127% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 49.7%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5273DH0-CH9 M473B5273DH0-YK0 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
47.7% Average
MC Read 16.7
MC Write 17.3
MC Mixed 15.2
47% 16.4 GB/s
SC Read 12
SC Write 15.2
SC Mixed 15
40% 14.1 GB/s
Latency 74.6
54% 74.6 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 47.7%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 4294CTO Builds (Compare 11 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 4294CTO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback