Fujitsu ESPRIMO P9900

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 67% Battle cruiser	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (95th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 5 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	8.92% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory	14GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 14GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Fujitsu ESPRIMO P9900 (all builds)
Motherboard	FUJITSU D2912-A1
Memory	10.7 GB free of 14 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100818
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 27 '20 at 12:09
Run Duration	141 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	3%

PC Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 870-$100 37,228 User benchmarks, average bench 66% CPU, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	73.3% Very good	Memory 93.1 1-Core 88.4 2-Core 171 70% 118 Pts	4-Core 297 8-Core 388 44% 342 Pts	64-Core 389 24% 389 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 73.3% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD HD 7750 22,655 User benchmarks, average bench 8% XFX(1682 3246) 1GB CLim: 800 MHz, MLim: 1125 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 20.10.00.17 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	8.92% Terrible	Lighting 10 Reflection 13.2 Parallax 13.3 8% 12.2 fps	MRender 11.2 Gravity 9.4 Splatting 15.9 10% 12.2 fps
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 8.92% Great: 9%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Toshiba MQ02ABF050H 500GB 1,432 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 428GB free (System drive) Firmware: HDFD2C SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 95 87 106 102 107 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 15% Great: 60%
Samsung HD502IJ 500GB-$40 25,285 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 464GB free Firmware: 1AA01118 SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 121 119 121 121 122 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	68.7% Good	Read 118 Write 124 Mixed 62.7 SusWrite 121 78% 106 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 1 187% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 68.7% Great: 59%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139 139,542 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 902GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 100 101 100 100 100 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	59.8% Above average	Read 108 Write 85.3 Mixed 69 SusWrite 100 67% 90.7 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.8 147% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 59.8% Great: 59%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 99U5402-034.A00LF 0443 RMR1870EC58E9F1333 0198 99U5402-034.A00LF 80CE M378B5773CH0-CH9 14GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	39.3% Below average	MC Read 15.3 MC Write 12.1 MC Mixed 11.8 37% 13.1 GB/s	SC Read 10.2 SC Write 10.1 SC Mixed 11.5 30% 10.6 GB/s	Latency 61.9 65% 61.9 ns
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 39.3% Great: 39%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ESPRIMO P9900 Builds (Compare 70 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 47%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu ESPRIMO P9900

CPU
Core i5 650Intel $70Bench 46%, 42,063 samples	23x
Core i7 870Intel $100Bench 66%, 37,228 samples	15x
Core i5-750Intel $72Bench 62%, 43,796 samples	7x

GPU
HD Graphics (Clarkdale 0.733/0.9 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 20,588 samples	8x
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	7x
GeForce GT 420NvidiaBench 2%, 9,903 samples	5x

SSD
870 EVO 500GBSamsung $62Bench 104%, 60,851 samples	5x
SSDPR-CX400-256 256GBBench 72%, 3,217 samples	4x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	3x

RAM
HMT451U6BFR8A-PB 80AD HMT451U6AFR8C-PB 80AD HMT451U6AFR8C-PB 80AD HMT451U6BFR8A-PB 16GBUnknownBench 40%, 3 samples	3x
HMT125U6TFR8C-H9 80CE M378B5673FH0-CH9 80AD HMT125U6TFR8C-H9 80CE M378B5673FH0-CH9 8GBUnknownBench 34%, 6 samples	3x
HP698650-154-KEB 4x4GBUnknownBench 45%, 7 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 51% - Above average

Total price: $132

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16