Novatech N85_N87,HJ,HJ1,HK1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics32.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive99.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemNovatech N85_N87,HJ,HJ1,HK1  (all builds)
MotherboardNovatech N85_N87,HJ,HJ1,HK1
Memory11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170705
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 27 '20 at 16:25
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
72.3% Very good
Memory 81.8
1-Core 112
2-Core 212
77% 135 Pts
4-Core 339
8-Core 565
55% 452 Pts
64-Core 586
36% 586 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 72.3%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti (Mobile)
Clevo(1558 850A) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 26.21.14.4575
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
32.6% Below average
Lighting 41.5
Reflection 30.2
Parallax 36.2
34% 36 fps
MRender 37.6
Gravity 38.8
Splatting 34.8
30% 37.1 fps
Poor: 21%
This bench: 32.6%
Great: 31%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 EVO M.2 250GB
68GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT21B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 337 160 150 143 135 134 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
99.3% Outstanding
Read 458
Write 419
Mixed 364
SusWrite 176
79% 354 MB/s
4K Read 37.8
4K Write 88.7
4K Mixed 54.3
174% 60.3 MB/s
DQ Read 372
DQ Write 332
DQ Mixed 344
260% 350 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 99.3%
Great: 122%
Seagate ST1000LM048-2E7172 1TB
127GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 59 59 59 59 60 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
32.6% Below average
Read 53.5
Write 105
Mixed 57.3
SusWrite 58.6
51% 68.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 4.5
4K Mixed 0.6
179% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 32.6%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown + + 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
76.1% Very good
MC Read 27.5
MC Write 28.8
MC Mixed 24.8
77% 27 GB/s
SC Read 16.5
SC Write 31.2
SC Mixed 23.2
68% 23.6 GB/s
Latency 77.3
52% 77.3 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 76.1%
Great: 76%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical N85_N87,HJ,HJ1,HK1 Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Novatech N85_N87,HJ,HJ1,HK1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback