Asus K52JT

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.35% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus K52JT  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK K52JT
Memory6.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1366x768x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110125
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 28 '20 at 12:13
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3 M 370-$167
Socket 989, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
45.5% Average
Memory 65.4
1-Core 60
2-Core 110
48% 78.6 Pts
4-Core 150
8-Core 151
20% 150 Pts
64-Core 150
9% 150 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 45.5%
Great: 45%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6300M
Asus(1043 1C92) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
1.35% Terrible
Lighting 1.6
Reflection 2.27
Parallax 1.91
1% 1.93 fps
MRender 2
Gravity 0.97
Splatting 2.17
1% 1.71 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.35%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Laptop SSHD 2.5" 1TB-$41
906GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPDA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 97 98 112 96 114 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
59.6% Above average
Read 109
Write 112
Mixed 60
SusWrite 96.9
69% 94.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 2
385% 2.93 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 59.6%
Great: 65%
Jmicron Generic 640GB
441GB free
Firmware: 0204
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 26 25 24 22 24 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
15.3% Very poor
Read 29.1
Write 22.1
Mixed 20.8
SusWrite 24
18% 24 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.5
88% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 15.3%
Great: 49%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown HMT351S6BFR8C-H9 Kingston 9905428-045.A00LF 8GB
1067, 1067 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
24.7% Poor
MC Read 8
MC Write 7
MC Mixed 10.3
24% 8.43 GB/s
SC Read 7.5
SC Write 5.2
SC Mixed 6.4
18% 6.37 GB/s
Latency 113
36% 113 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 24.7%
Great: 39%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical K52JT Builds (Compare 90 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Asus K52JT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 50% - Above average Total price: $232
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback