Asus RAMPAGE IV FORMULA

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive44.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus RAMPAGE IV FORMULA  (all builds)
Memory10.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141205
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateMar 29 '20 at 15:29
Run Duration159 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2667 v2
LGA2011, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
80.4% Excellent
Memory 86.3
1-Core 90.6
2-Core 176
69% 117 Pts
4-Core 400
8-Core 796
71% 598 Pts
64-Core 1,002
62% 1,002 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 80.4%
Great: 81%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 240 GB 240GB
195GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF4500RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 250 45 71 119 130 122 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
44.4% Average
Read 408
Write 333
Mixed 290
SusWrite 123
64% 289 MB/s
4K Read 12
4K Write 36.3
4K Mixed 14.4
56% 20.9 MB/s
DQ Read 71.6
DQ Write 82.5
DQ Mixed 41.8
41% 65.3 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 44.4%
Great: 56%
WD Black 1.5TB (2010)
113GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 86 84 82 80 80 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
47.2% Average
Read 80.8
Write 83
Mixed 66.8
SusWrite 83.3
58% 78.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1
192% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 47.2%
Great: 85%
Seagate ST1000LM010-9YH146 1TB
91GB free
Firmware: CC9F
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 67 68 69 72 70 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
38.1% Below average
Read 64.7
Write 61.5
Mixed 25.3
SusWrite 68.3
40% 55 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.3
66% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 38.1%
Great: 48%
Generic Flash Disk 16GB
7GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.8 7.5 6.8 7.5 8 7.7 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
2.84% Terrible
Read 6.8
Write 2
Mixed 2
SusWrite 7
6% 4.45 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
5% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.84%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMX8GX3M2A1600C9 CMX8GX3M2A1600C9 CMX8GX3M2A1600C9 CMX4GX3M1A1600C9 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
78.7% Very good
MC Read 35.9
MC Write 27.1
MC Mixed 28
87% 30.3 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 13.4
SC Mixed 11.1
37% 13 GB/s
Latency 71
56% 71 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 78.7%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical RAMPAGE IV FORMULA Builds (Compare 579 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 63%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 55%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus RAMPAGE IV FORMULA - $714

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $1,215
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products, which UserBenchmark reveals.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback