Dell Studio XPS 8100

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics18.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemDell Studio XPS 8100
MotherboardDell Studio XPS 8100  (all builds)
Memory8.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100708
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateMar 29 '20 at 19:28
Run Duration201 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 33%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 870-$100
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
63.5% Good
Memory 85.2
1-Core 71.8
2-Core 129
59% 95.2 Pts
4-Core 228
8-Core 322
35% 275 Pts
64-Core 322
20% 322 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 63.5%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
CLim: 1333 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 445.75
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
18.3% Very poor
Lighting 22.9
Reflection 17.3
Parallax 20.4
19% 20.2 fps
MRender 25.6
Gravity 23.2
Splatting 17.3
18% 22 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 18.3%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 2TB
797GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 14 27 13 18 37 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
38.9% Below average
Read 116
Write 142
Mixed 34.5
SusWrite 19.7
57% 78.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.4
73% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 38.9%
Great: 155%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 68GB
63GB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 71 49 52 62 51 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
39.9% Below average
Read 81
Write 42.5
Mixed 30
SusWrite 57.9
39% 52.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.2
64% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 39.9%
Great: 121%
WD My Passport 0740 1TB
295GB free, PID 0740
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.8 5.4 4.9 4.9 5 3.7 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
1.31% Terrible
Read 1.8
Write 1.8
Mixed 2.3
SusWrite 4.8
4% 2.67 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
0% 0 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 1.31%
Great: 41%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 4GB
3GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.7 5.2 5.3 5.3 4.9 5.4 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
9.79% Terrible
Read 16
Write 3.5
Mixed 8.5
SusWrite 5.1
10% 8.27 MB/s
4K Read 3.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 2.1
146% 2.47 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 9.79%
Great: 12%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351U6BFR8C-H9 HMT351U6BFR8C-H9 CT51264BD160B.C16F CT51264BD160B.C16F 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
35.2% Below average
MC Read 12.2
MC Write 12.1
MC Mixed 11.6
34% 12 GB/s
SC Read 7.4
SC Write 8.8
SC Mixed 9.4
24% 8.53 GB/s
Latency 71.8
56% 71.8 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 35.2%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Studio XPS 8100 Builds (Compare 669 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Dell Studio XPS 8100

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $488
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4070 $515Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback