HP Z800 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics21.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive33.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP Z800 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 0AECh
Memory13 GB free of 24.002 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160224
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMar 29 '20 at 23:34
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5530
CPU0 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
66.4% Good
Memory 86.6
1-Core 67.2
2-Core 134
59% 96 Pts
4-Core 254
8-Core 340
38% 297 Pts
64-Core 620
38% 620 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 66.4%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 580-$450
Gainward(10B0 0401) 1.5GB
CLim: 783 MHz, MLim: 1005 MHz, Ram: 1.5GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
21.1% Poor
Lighting 22.8
Reflection 31.6
Parallax 20.4
19% 24.9 fps
MRender 41.5
Gravity 21.8
Splatting 32.3
26% 31.9 fps
Poor: 22%
This bench: 21.1%
Great: 24%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ CACHE-SYNAPSE 64GB
16GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 82 86 89 87 83 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
33.8% Below average
Read 142
Write 102
Mixed 108
SusWrite 85.8
24% 110 MB/s
4K Read 11.1
4K Write 33.2
4K Mixed 17.4
57% 20.6 MB/s
DQ Read 128
DQ Write 102
DQ Mixed 103
80% 111 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 33.8%
Great: 60%
Hitachi HUA722020ALA330 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: JKAOA34E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 114 114 116 114 115 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
63.9% Good
Read 109
Write 111
Mixed 60.3
SusWrite 114
72% 98.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
133% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 63.9%
Great: 70%
Hitachi HUA722020ALA330 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: JKAOA34E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 117 118 119 118 117 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
65.4% Good
Read 110
Write 114
Mixed 54.5
SusWrite 118
72% 99.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
133% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 65.4%
Great: 70%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$64
98GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 116 115 116 118 117 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
64% Good
Read 106
Write 108
Mixed 73.5
SusWrite 116
74% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
193% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 64%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:80 CE M391B5773DH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M391B5773DH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M391B5773DH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M391B5773DH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M391B5773DH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M391B5773DH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M391B5773DH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M... 58GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 34816 MB
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
32.7% Below average
MC Read 11.8
MC Write 10.8
MC Mixed 10.2
31% 10.9 GB/s
SC Read 9.7
SC Write 6.1
SC Mixed 8.6
23% 8.13 GB/s
Latency 70.8
56% 70.8 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 32.7%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z800 Workstation Builds (Compare 1,961 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: HP Z800 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback