Today's hottest deals

Dell OptiPlex 7010

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemDell OptiPlex 7010
MotherboardDell OptiPlex 7010  (all builds)
Memory5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20150126
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 18 '17 at 20:36
Run Duration169 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
78.2% Very good
Memory 88.6
1-Core 105
2-Core 201
76% 132 Pts
4-Core 370
8-Core 512
56% 441 Pts
64-Core 517
32% 517 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 78.2%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)-$15
Dell(1028 0577) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.2932
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 3% Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 1.5TB-$150
543GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC1H Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
45.7% Average
Read 80.3
Write 78.9
Mixed 36.2
48% 65.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.55
4K Write 1.23
4K Mixed 0.32
81% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 45.7%
Great: 70%
Hitachi HDS723030BLE640 3TB
1TB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
15.8% Very poor
Read 32.4
Write 26.2
Mixed 8.54
26% 22.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.86
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.16
66% 0.91 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 15.8%
Great: 57%
Hitachi HDS723030BLE640 3TB
235GB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
41.9% Average
Read 94.7
Write 101
Mixed 94.1
126% 96.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.02
4K Write 1.93
4K Mixed 0.2
76% 1.05 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
55.8% Above average
MC Read 21.3
MC Write 19.4
MC Mixed 17.2
55% 19.3 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 16.9
SC Mixed 17.3
48% 16.7 GB/s
Latency 68.9
58% 68.9 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 55.8%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical OptiPlex 7010 Builds (Compare 12,120 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Dell OptiPlex 7010

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $94
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback