MSI X299 SLI PLUS (MS-7A93)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 84%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics112% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive266% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7A93
MotherboardMSI X299 SLI PLUS (MS-7A93)  (all builds)
Memory22.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170602
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 30 '20 at 14:03
Run Duration222 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 16%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7800X-$216
CPU0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
70.1% Very good
Memory 83.9
1-Core 153
2-Core 250
91% 162 Pts
4-Core 302
8-Core 703
58% 503 Pts
64-Core 861
53% 861 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 70.1%
Great: 87%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
CLim: 1244 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.20
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
41.4% Average
Lighting 50.1
Reflection 62.4
Parallax 61.1
41% 57.9 fps
MRender 61.5
Gravity 43.8
Splatting 51
42% 52.1 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 41.4%
Great: 49%
Nvidia Titan X Pascal-$286
CLim: 2050 MHz, MLim: 2602 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 442.59
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
112% Outstanding
Lighting 147
Reflection 167
Parallax 153
120% 156 fps
MRender 115
Gravity 153
Splatting 123
106% 131 fps
Poor: 108%
This bench: 112%
Great: 132%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
351GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 881 637 628 634 635 635 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
266% Outstanding
Read 2,140
Write 1,559
Mixed 818
SusWrite 675
288% 1,298 MB/s
4K Read 52
4K Write 213
4K Mixed 72.8
285% 113 MB/s
DQ Read 1,197
DQ Write 1,136
DQ Mixed 966
780% 1,100 MB/s
Poor: 153%
This bench: 266%
Great: 254%
Techman XC100E5C-3200 3TB
2TB free
Firmware: 1.03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1098 1095 1101 1099 1097 1098 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
212% Outstanding
Read 690
Write 1,103
Mixed 573
SusWrite 1098
197% 866 MB/s
4K Read 46.4
4K Write 144
4K Mixed 42
200% 77.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,435
DQ Write 1,173
DQ Mixed 1,269
960% 1,292 MB/s
Poor: 180%
This bench: 212%
Great: 212%
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
223GB free
Firmware: 5A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 448 442 439 425 434 435 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 508
Write 444
Mixed 419
SusWrite 437
102% 452 MB/s
4K Read 33.7
4K Write 129
4K Mixed 33.5
162% 65.4 MB/s
DQ Read 220
DQ Write 322
DQ Mixed 48.3
99% 197 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 107%
Great: 100%
WD WD25EZRS-00J99B0 2.5TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 78 80 79 78 79 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
48.3% Average
Read 89.5
Write 69
Mixed 72.2
SusWrite 78.8
57% 77.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.5
99% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 48.3%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
88.8% Excellent
MC Read 22.4
MC Write 56
MC Mixed 26.6
100% 35 GB/s
SC Read 6.4
SC Write 20.1
SC Mixed 10.8
36% 12.4 GB/s
Latency 73.6
54% 73.6 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 88.8%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X299 SLI PLUS (MS-7A93) Builds (Compare 791 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 98%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 92%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: MSI X299 SLI PLUS (MS-7A93)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $796
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback