Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 60% Destroyer	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	6.62% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

PC Performing as expected (45^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2400-$250 166,255 User benchmarks, average bench 61% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	59.8% Above average	Memory 90.7 1-Core 86.7 2-Core 155 68% 111 Pts	4-Core 171 8-Core 170 23% 170 Pts	64-Core 170 10% 170 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 59.8% Great: 70%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730 164,888 User benchmarks, average bench 5% EVGA(3842 3733) 2GB CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 431.60 Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	6.62% Terrible	Lighting 8.07 Reflection 6.96 Parallax 7.12 7% 7.38 fps	MRender 10.7 Gravity 7.3 Splatting 7.13 7% 8.38 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 6.62% Great: 7%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$66 212,471 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 298GB free (System drive) Firmware: 51.0AB51 SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 35 46 30 24 49 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	31.1% Below average	Read 70.2 Write 57 Mixed 74 SusWrite 37.8 45% 59.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.6 115% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 31.1% Great: 67%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT125U6TFR8C-H9 Kingston K1N7HK-HYC HMT125U6BFR8C-H9 Kingston K1N7HK-HYC 8GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	43.7% Average	MC Read 13.4 MC Write 14.4 MC Mixed 15.2 41% 14.3 GB/s	SC Read 13.2 SC Write 14.9 SC Mixed 15.3 41% 14.5 GB/s	Latency 66.2 60% 66.2 ns
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 43.7% Great: 52%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 57%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	1,229x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	454x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	397x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	80x
HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 2x4GBHynixBench 48%, 7,511 samples	59x
M378B5273DH0-CH9 2x4GBSamsungBench 48%, 11,003 samples	50x

Value: 58% - Above average

Total price: $278