Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

PC Performing as expected (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 T5600-$99 1,304 User benchmarks, average bench 31% Socket 478, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.85 GHz Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	35.9% Below average	Memory 65.5 1-Core 20.8 2-Core 40.9 31% 42.4 Pts	4-Core 40.9 8-Core 41 5% 41 Pts	64-Core 41.1 2% 41.1 Pts
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 35.9% Great: 36%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS541612J9SA00 120GB-$40 2,383 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 18GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBDOC7DP SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 30 32 25 16 20 MB/s Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	16.6% Very poor	Read 32.6 Write 32.4 Mixed 20.9 SusWrite 25 20% 27.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.5 93% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 16.6% Great: 25%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM SDRAM Performing below potential (22^nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	12.6% Very poor	MC Read 4.8 MC Write 2.9 MC Mixed 3.1 10% 3.6 GB/s	SC Read 4 SC Write 3.3 SC Mixed 4 11% 3.77 GB/s	Latency 113 36% 113 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 12.6% Great: 44%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 31%

Sail boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
GeForce Go 7300NvidiaBench 0%, 116 samples	12x

SSD
Fury 120GBHyperX $160Bench 64%, 11,403 samples	2x
THNSNH128GCST 128GBToshibaBench 76%, 1,729 samples	1x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	1x

Value: 18% - Very poor

Total price: $259