Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-F2A58M-HD2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics8.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-F2A58M-HD2  (all builds)
Memory11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140324
Uptime8.4 Days
Run DateApr 02 '20 at 22:24
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-6600K APU-$88
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
58.2% Above average
Memory 79.4
1-Core 70.5
2-Core 126
57% 92 Pts
4-Core 217
8-Core 211
29% 214 Pts
64-Core 203
13% 203 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 58.2%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$90
CLim: 732 MHz, MLim: 1355 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 442.19
Relative performance (0th percentile)
8.6% Terrible
Lighting 10.7
Reflection 8.04
Parallax 9.94
9% 9.57 fps
MRender 12.6
Gravity 10.8
Splatting 8.04
8% 10.5 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 8.6%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$35
446GB free
Firmware: SBFKB1D1
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,352
Write 26.5
Mixed 61.5
169% 813 MB/s
4K Read 244
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 4.3
376% 83.4 MB/s
Poor: 39% Great: 102%
Sandisk S3 500G 500GB
227GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 401100RL
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 168
Write 182
Mixed 114
34% 154 MB/s
4K Read 21.7
4K Write 48
4K Mixed 12.4
74% 27.4 MB/s
DQ Read 15.7
DQ Write 70.7
DQ Mixed 37.9
31% 41.4 MB/s
Poor: 63% Great: 116%
Rsh-319 ASM1153E 1.5TB
1TB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 33 33 33 33 32 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
19.6% Very poor
Read 34.8
Write 26.3
Mixed 29.5
SusWrite 32.9
23% 30.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
142% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 19.6%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Team-Elite-16 Corsair CMY16GX3M2A18 16GB
1600, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
31.7% Below average
MC Read 15.1
MC Write 6.5
MC Mixed 10.8
31% 10.8 GB/s
SC Read 6.7
SC Write 7
SC Mixed 9.7
22% 7.8 GB/s
Latency 81.6
49% 81.6 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 31.7%
Great: 36%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-F2A58M-HD2 Builds (Compare 47 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-F2A58M-HD2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $113
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback