ADD TO PC
BUILD

Anabelleb Pedra BA10

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 35% Sail boat	Desktop 75% Battleship	Workstation 27% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	46.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

System	Anabelleb Pedra BA10 (all builds)
Motherboard	Intel DB75EN
Memory	8 GB free of 10 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20130704
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 03 '20 at 06:47
Run Duration	119 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	1%

Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3470-$59 223,595 User benchmarks, average bench 63% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	74.1% Very good	Memory 83.9 1-Core 96.6 2-Core 192 72% 124 Pts	4-Core 372 8-Core 375 50% 374 Pts	64-Core 371 23% 371 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 74.1% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155 259,091 User benchmarks, average bench 43% MSI(1462 8D92) CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 445.75 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	46.8% Average	Lighting 61 Reflection 57.4 Parallax 50.2 50% 56.2 fps	MRender 45.7 Gravity 53.2 Splatting 51.5 41% 50.1 fps
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 46.8% Great: 46%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB-$21 80,932 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 90GB free (System drive) Firmware: 01.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 39 39 34 38 40 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	37.2% Below average	Read 91.3 Write 51.8 Mixed 38 SusWrite 38 40% 54.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.6 115% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 37.2% Great: 61%
Hitachi HDS721050CLA362 500GB-$59 47,815 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 44GB free Firmware: JP2O SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 75 74 77 77 77 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	32.9% Below average	Read 38.3 Write 76.8 Mixed 19.3 SusWrite 76.1 38% 52.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.7 127% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 32.9% Great: 74%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown RMR1870EF48E8W1333 0443 RMR1870EF48E8W1333 0707 GU512303EP0202 Micron 16JTF51264AZ-1G6M1 10GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1600 MHz 2048, 2048, 2048, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	51.5% Above average	MC Read 18.4 MC Write 18.5 MC Mixed 16.2 51% 17.7 GB/s	SC Read 14.7 SC Write 15.8 SC Mixed 16.8 45% 15.8 GB/s	Latency 73.6 54% 73.6 ns
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 51.5% Great: 51%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback