Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 2320A12

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.9% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive84% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 2320A12  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 2320A12
Memory12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit 色彩
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190924
Uptime7 Days
Run DateApr 04 '20 at 15:24
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User TWN-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-2370M-$272
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
53% Above average
Memory 79
1-Core 54.9
2-Core 111
51% 81.8 Pts
4-Core 159
8-Core 158
21% 158 Pts
64-Core 159
10% 159 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 53%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)
Legend(17AA 21FA) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
1.9% Terrible
Lighting 2.1
Reflection 3.15
Parallax 1.41
2% 2.22 fps
MRender 2.9
Gravity 1.13
Splatting 3.87
2% 2.64 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.9%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
MZ7LM480HCHP00D6 480GB
178GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GA30
SusWrite @10s intervals: 390 395 398 391 387 384 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
84% Excellent
Read 428
Write 381
Mixed 294
SusWrite 391
84% 374 MB/s
4K Read 19.3
4K Write 47.7
4K Mixed 26.2
88% 31.1 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 325
DQ Mixed 282
230% 328 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 84%
Great: 84%
USB DISK 2.0 64GB
42GB free, PID 4100
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.4 13 18 11 17 16 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
8.45% Terrible
Read 25.8
Write 6.5
Mixed 9
SusWrite 13.5
16% 13.7 MB/s
4K Read 7.5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.1
31% 2.53 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 8.45%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Transcend TS1GSK64V6H 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
46.6% Average
MC Read 16.3
MC Write 17.5
MC Mixed 15.4
47% 16.4 GB/s
SC Read 12.3
SC Write 12.5
SC Mixed 13.3
36% 12.7 GB/s
Latency 82.3
49% 82.3 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 46.6%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback