Today's hottest deals

IBM System x3650 -[7979AC1]-

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.42% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive47.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemIBM System x3650 -[7979AC1]-  (all builds)
MotherboardIBM System Planar
Memory29.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110211
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 05 '20 at 04:06
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5450
CPU 1, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
46.3% Average
Memory 60.9
1-Core 40.5
2-Core 85.3
39% 62.2 Pts
4-Core 172
8-Core 326
30% 249 Pts
64-Core 339
21% 339 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 46.3%
Great: 49%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6450
PwrHis(1787 2013) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Relative performance (0th percentile)
0.42% Terrible
Lighting 0
Reflection 1.65
Parallax 2.06
0% 1.24 fps
MRender 1.57
Gravity 1.4
Splatting 1.57
1% 1.51 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 0.42%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adaptec Array 480GB
405GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 108 108 107 107 108 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
47.2% Average
Read 431
Write 326
Mixed 377
SusWrite 108
69% 310 MB/s
4K Read 20.7
4K Write 21.1
4K Mixed 21.9
71% 21.2 MB/s
DQ Read 21.4
DQ Write 34.2
DQ Mixed 25.5
20% 27 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 47.2%
Great: 102%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 32GB
null MHz
4096, 4096, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 4096, 4096, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
16.2% Very poor
MC Read 5.7
MC Write 4.9
MC Mixed 5.5
15% 5.37 GB/s
SC Read 3.6
SC Write 3.5
SC Mixed 4
11% 3.7 GB/s
Latency 125
32% 125 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 16.2%
Great: 101%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $147
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback