Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

ADD TO PC
BUILD

Neousys POC-300

Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 33% Sail boat	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	2.08% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	38.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Neousys POC-300 (all builds)
Motherboard	Neousys POC-300
Memory	1.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180530
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 06 '20 at 20:58
Run Duration	117 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Atom E3950 176 User benchmarks, average bench 28% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	35% Below average	Memory 42.6 1-Core 39.9 2-Core 81.3 32% 54.6 Pts	4-Core 159 8-Core 162 21% 160 Pts	64-Core 161 10% 161 Pts
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 35% Great: 35%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 505 2,850 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Intel(8086 7270) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7262 Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	2.08% Terrible	Lighting 2.9 Reflection 3.42 Parallax 3.19 2% 3.17 fps	MRender 3.29 Gravity 3.1 Splatting 0.04 2% 2.14 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 2.08% Great: 3%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Msata mini 3ME4 64GB 28 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 41GB free (System drive) Firmware: L17606 SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 84 82 85 87 85 MB/s Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	38.3% Below average	Read 150 Write 97.1 Mixed 78.3 SusWrite 84 23% 102 MB/s	4K Read 19.5 4K Write 40.2 4K Mixed 20.4 77% 26.7 MB/s	DQ Read 88.4 DQ Write 72.2 DQ Mixed 56.9 49% 72.5 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 38.3% Great: 52%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown M3S0-4GSSCLQE 1x4GB 1 of 1 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	25.3% Poor	MC Read 9.2 MC Write 11.8 MC Mixed 8.3 28% 9.77 GB/s	SC Read 3.3 SC Write 4.3 SC Mixed 3.4 10% 3.67 GB/s	Latency 190 21% 190 ns

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $337	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback