Asrock A75M-HVS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics71.4% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive35.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory9GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 9GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock A75M-HVS  (all builds)
Memory7.9 GB free of 9 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121119
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 10 '20 at 13:05
Run Duration157 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU 22%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-3870 APU-$81
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
49.4% Average
Memory 67.5
1-Core 45.3
2-Core 92.3
43% 68.4 Pts
4-Core 183
8-Core 184
24% 183 Pts
64-Core 186
12% 186 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 49.4%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$238
Nvidia(10DE 21C4) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 441.08
Performing below potential (52nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
71.4% Very good
Lighting 87.7
Reflection 80.3
Parallax 83.1
72% 83.7 fps
MRender 116
Gravity 77
Splatting 74.9
71% 89.3 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 71.4%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston V300S37A120G 120GB
59GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P0921A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 129 140 146 147 146 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
35.6% Below average
Read 184
Write 138
Mixed 114
SusWrite 140
32% 144 MB/s
4K Read 13.9
4K Write 57.6
4K Mixed 6.8
60% 26.1 MB/s
DQ Read 18.7
DQ Write 95.2
DQ Mixed 7.8
20% 40.6 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 35.6%
Great: 52%
WD Black 2.5" 320GB (2010)-$45
128GB free
Firmware: 11.01A11
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 71 71 71 71 71 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
41.7% Average
Read 74.6
Write 73.6
Mixed 52.3
SusWrite 70.4
50% 67.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
158% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 41.7%
Great: 60%
Seagate Laptop SSHD 2.5" 1TB-$41
813GB free
Firmware: SM28
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 109 108 108 109 109 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
63.6% Good
Read 112
Write 112
Mixed 60.4
SusWrite 108
72% 98 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 5
4K Mixed 2
386% 2.9 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 63.6%
Great: 65%
Samsung Flash Drive DUO 32GB
27GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 26 28 27 25 26 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
30.1% Below average
Read 127
Write 36.3
Mixed 48.8
SusWrite 26.1
66% 59.6 MB/s
4K Read 4.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 1.5
123% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 30.1%
Great: 32%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M391B2873FH0-CH9 F3-1600C11-8GIS 9GB
1333, 1600 MHz
1024, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
18.4% Very poor
MC Read 6.9
MC Write 5.1
MC Mixed 4.9
16% 5.63 GB/s
SC Read 4.6
SC Write 6.9
SC Mixed 6.7
17% 6.07 GB/s
Latency 107
37% 107 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 18.4%
Great: 18%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A75M-HVS Builds (Compare 59 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock A75M-HVS - $238

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 39% - Below average Total price: $407
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback