Asus Maximus IV Extreme

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics23.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive77.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsus Maximus IV Extreme  (all builds)
Memory12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110328
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateApr 11 '20 at 18:17
Run Duration169 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
72.8% Very good
Memory 89.5
1-Core 95.4
2-Core 190
73% 125 Pts
4-Core 304
8-Core 454
47% 379 Pts
64-Core 473
29% 473 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 72.8%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 580-$450
Asus(1043 8385) 1.5GB
CLim: 782 MHz, MLim: 1002 MHz, Ram: 1.5GB, Driver: 390.77
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
23.5% Poor
Lighting 27.2
Reflection 42.2
Parallax 30.4
22% 33.2 fps
MRender 42.6
Gravity 21.7
Splatting 32.2
26% 32.1 fps
Poor: 22%
This bench: 23.5%
Great: 24%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 500GB-$53
376GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR022
SusWrite @10s intervals: 233 247 255 251 249 253 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
77.2% Very good
Read 395
Write 358
Mixed 362
SusWrite 248
77% 341 MB/s
4K Read 28.9
4K Write 55.9
4K Mixed 36.6
120% 40.5 MB/s
DQ Read 201
DQ Write 189
DQ Mixed 188
143% 193 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 77.2%
Great: 125%
WD Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$149
714GB free
Firmware: 211070WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1050 849 809 798 791 804 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
179% Outstanding
Read 1,030
Write 1,031
Mixed 854
SusWrite 850
212% 941 MB/s
4K Read 36.7
4K Write 107
4K Mixed 57.1
185% 66.9 MB/s
DQ Read 752
DQ Write 487
DQ Mixed 647
475% 629 MB/s
Poor: 164%
This bench: 179%
Great: 276%
Samsung 860 QVO 2TB-$200
1TB free
Firmware: RVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 257 261 265 263 262 265 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
83.6% Excellent
Read 469
Write 408
Mixed 349
SusWrite 262
83% 372 MB/s
4K Read 28.2
4K Write 65.2
4K Mixed 38.6
127% 44 MB/s
DQ Read 216
DQ Write 200
DQ Mixed 205
155% 207 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 83.6%
Great: 122%
WD WD5000LPLX-00ZNTT0 500GB
389GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 110 112 113 114 115 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
64.2% Good
Read 113
Write 56.8
Mixed 39
SusWrite 110
58% 79.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.6
105% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 64.2%
Great: 82%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 991987 (996987) Samsung M378B5173QH0-CK0 991987 (996987) Hynix HMT451U6BFR8A-PB 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
45.2% Average
MC Read 15.2
MC Write 15.4
MC Mixed 14.5
43% 15 GB/s
SC Read 12.6
SC Write 15.5
SC Mixed 15.5
42% 14.5 GB/s
Latency 67.8
59% 67.8 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 45.2%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Maximus IV Extreme Builds (Compare 321 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 73%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 59%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus Maximus IV Extreme

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $590
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback