Sony SVE1713L4E

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.96% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive58.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (43%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemSony SVE1713L4E  (all builds)
MotherboardSony VAIO
Memory2.3 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120313
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateApr 12 '20 at 16:16
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 43%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3230M-$100
N/A, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
55.2% Above average
Memory 85.5
1-Core 84
2-Core 132
62% 100 Pts
4-Core 146
8-Core 161
20% 153 Pts
64-Core 207
13% 207 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 55.2%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7500M
Sony(104D 90AC) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
2.96% Terrible
Lighting 5.5
Reflection 5.5
Parallax 4.28
4% 5.09 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.96%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Spcc SSD162 240GB
26GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 507ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 130 134 115 125 117 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
58.4% Above average
Read 335
Write 218
Mixed 241
SusWrite 132
52% 232 MB/s
4K Read 22.4
4K Write 38.7
4K Mixed 26
88% 29 MB/s
DQ Read 274
DQ Write 159
DQ Mixed 192
150% 209 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 58.4%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5273DH0-YK0 M471B5773DH0-CK0 6GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
41.9% Average
MC Read 13.1
MC Write 14.6
MC Mixed 13.3
39% 13.7 GB/s
SC Read 14
SC Write 14.6
SC Mixed 14.9
41% 14.5 GB/s
Latency 71.6
56% 71.6 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 41.9%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback