Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-Sabre 15WV8

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics48.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Sabre 15WV8  (all builds)
Memory10 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180517
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 14 '20 at 11:32
Run Duration122 Seconds
Run User SGP-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
83.6% Excellent
Memory 91.3
1-Core 124
2-Core 238
86% 151 Pts
4-Core 409
8-Core 643
65% 526 Pts
64-Core 796
49% 796 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 83.6%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060 (Mobile)
Clevo(1558 8500) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 442.59
Performing below potential (77th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
48.7% Average
Lighting 58.1
Reflection 68.2
Parallax 57.2
47% 61.1 fps
MRender 67.3
Gravity 56.2
Splatting 63.8
51% 62.4 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 48.7%
Great: 52%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Transcend MTE820 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB
28GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CB1.1.A Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 730
Write 860
Mixed 648
167% 746 MB/s
4K Read 30.7
4K Write 105
4K Mixed 46.5
162% 60.8 MB/s
DQ Read 266
DQ Write 625
DQ Mixed 316
278% 403 MB/s
Poor: 83% Great: 120%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
327GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3U0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 92 95 94 96 93 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
54.9% Above average
Read 97.5
Write 94.5
Mixed 21.2
SusWrite 93.8
56% 76.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
122% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 54.9%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston CBD24D4S7D8ME-16 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
44.5% Average
MC Read 15.5
MC Write 15.4
MC Mixed 12.5
41% 14.5 GB/s
SC Read 13.7
SC Write 16.7
SC Mixed 15.5
44% 15.3 GB/s
Latency 65.2
61% 65.2 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 44.5%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Sabre 15WV8 Builds (Compare 19 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Sabre 15WV8

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $147
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback