Gigabyte GA-F2A88XM-HD3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics4.4% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive86.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (58%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-F2A88XM-HD3  (all builds)
Memory4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151225
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 15 '20 at 16:01
Run Duration198 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 58%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD A6-7400K APU (2014 D.Ka)
P0, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
40.4% Average
Memory 60.5
1-Core 52.3
2-Core 116
46% 76.4 Pts
4-Core 121
8-Core 108
16% 115 Pts
64-Core 110
7% 110 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 40.4%
Great: 49%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 Graphics
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 19.20
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
4.4% Terrible
Lighting 16.3
Reflection 20.1
Parallax 21.4
4% 19.3 fps
MRender 13.6
Gravity 15.5
Splatting 21
4% 16.7 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.4%
Great: 4%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$100
204GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 303 239 256 258 259 258 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
86.2% Excellent
Read 435
Write 410
Mixed 330
SusWrite 262
81% 359 MB/s
4K Read 27.4
4K Write 77.1
4K Mixed 40.9
135% 48.5 MB/s
DQ Read 254
DQ Write 225
DQ Mixed 172
147% 217 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 86.2%
Great: 115%
WD WD5000AACS-00ZUB0 500GB
396GB free
Firmware: 05.04C05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 62 62 62 61 60 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
36.8% Below average
Read 66.8
Write 61.5
Mixed 44.2
SusWrite 61
43% 58.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 36.8%
Great: 49%
WD Green 1.5TB (2010)-$64
373GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 69 69 69 70 67 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
34% Below average
Read 50.9
Write 61.5
Mixed 26.6
SusWrite 67.7
38% 51.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.4
77% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 34%
Great: 63%
Seagate IronWolf 4TB (2016)-$105
2TB free
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 163 165 166 166 167 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
90.6% Outstanding
Read 153
Write 149
Mixed 60.6
SusWrite 164
96% 132 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
158% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 90.6%
Great: 110%
Kingston DataTraveler 101 G2 USB 2.0 32GB-$15
17GB free, PID 1642
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.1 6.4 5.7 5.4 5.1 5.1 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 17.7
Write 5
Mixed 1.7
SusWrite 5.4
8% 7.45 MB/s
4K Read 3.2
4K Mixed 0
18% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 4% Great: 10%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
26.2% Poor
MC Read 10.4
MC Write 7.1
MC Mixed 10.1
26% 9.2 GB/s
SC Read 4.9
SC Write 5.6
SC Mixed 9.3
19% 6.6 GB/s
Latency 126
32% 126 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 26.2%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical GA-F2A88XM-HD3 Builds (Compare 382 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-F2A88XM-HD3 - $80

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 37% - Below average Total price: $294
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $195Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9400F $140Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $170Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $290Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super) $505Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $42
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $69SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $65SanDisk Extreme 32GB $30
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Extreme 16GB $28
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback