Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-F2A68HM-DS2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 36%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (10th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 90 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 19.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics31.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive4.38% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (55%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-F2A68HM-DS2  (all builds)
Memory2.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161207
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 25 '22 at 12:43
Run Duration312 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 55%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A6-7400K APU (2014 D.Ka)
P0, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
19.5% Very poor
Memory 30.1
1-Core 45.6
2-Core 44.2
25% 40 Pts
4-Core 52.6
8-Core 56.7
7% 54.7 Pts
64-Core 54.1
3% 54.1 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 19.5%
Great: 45%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$170
CLim: 1281 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 22.5.2
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
31.9% Below average
Lighting 31.7
Reflection 16.7
Parallax 49.4
26% 32.6 fps
MRender 57.4
Gravity 64
Splatting 43
44% 54.8 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 31.9%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Xstar 128GB 128GB
12GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2020XKR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 26 6.7 8.8 8.8 17 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
4.38% Terrible
Read 55
Write 16.6
Mixed 32.9
SusWrite 15
7% 29.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 3.8
4K Mixed 0.8
4% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 4.38%
Great: 80%
Seagate ST3160215SCE 160GB-$20
45GB free
Firmware: 3.ACF
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 21 28 35 43 37 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
23.3% Poor
Read 51
Write 48.7
Mixed 36
SusWrite 30
31% 41.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.8
130% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 23.3%
Great: 42%
Seagate ST1000VM002-1CT162 1TB
96GB free
Firmware: SC12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 24 5.7 7.7 7.9 16 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
28.7% Poor
Read 85.2
Write 79.4
Mixed 46.4
SusWrite 14.6
42% 56.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
133% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 28.7%
Great: 98%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD3 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
10.3% Very poor
MC Read 4.8
MC Write 1.6
MC Mixed 3.5
9% 3.3 GB/s
SC Read 3.7
SC Write 4.1
SC Mixed 2.5
10% 3.43 GB/s
Latency 254
16% 254 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 10.3%
Great: 31%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-F2A68HM-DS2 Builds (Compare 301 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-F2A68HM-DS2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 23% - Poor Total price: $25
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $298WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback