Average Bench: 47.1% (92nd of 105)

Based on 5,554 user benchmarks.  Model: Kingston KHX1866C10D3/ 2x8GB

Below average average bench

The Kingston HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GB averaged 52.9% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. 16 Core Read Bench 20.1GB/s
Avg. Physical RAM Latency 71.7ns

Good consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Kingston HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GB is 24.8%. This is a relatively narrow range which indicates that the Kingston HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GB performs reasonably consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. 1 Core Write Bench 8.35GB/s
Avg. 1 Core Read Bench 10.1GB/s
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 5,554 samples)
Min Avg Max
10.6 MC Read 20.1 24.1
7.4 MC Write 13.4 16.7
9.3 MC Mixed 17 19.9
48% 16.8 GB/s
Min Avg Max
6.42 SC Read 10.1 12.3
6 SC Write 8.35 9.7
8.3 SC Mixed 12.1 14.3
29.1% 10.2 GB/s
Min Avg Max
60.4 Latency 71.7 99.2
55.8% 71.7 ns
User Benchmarks Bench Multi core Single core Latency
The fastest RAM (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 933 MHz
MC Read 24.1
MC Write 16
MC Mixed 19.7
57% 19.9 GB/s
SC Read 11.4
SC Write 8.7
SC Mixed 14.1
33% 11.4 GB/s
Latency 58.9
68% 58.9 ns
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 933 MHz
MC Read 23.5
MC Write 13.9
MC Mixed 19.2
54% 18.9 GB/s
SC Read 11.8
SC Write 8.8
SC Mixed 14.9
34% 11.8 GB/s
Latency 61.8
65% 61.8 ns
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 933 MHz
MC Read 22.6
MC Write 14.6
MC Mixed 18.5
53% 18.6 GB/s
SC Read 11.4
SC Write 8.4
SC Mixed 12.9
31% 10.9 GB/s
Latency 61.5
65% 61.5 ns
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 933 MHz
MC Read 21.6
MC Write 14.7
MC Mixed 18.8
52% 18.4 GB/s
SC Read 11
SC Write 9.1
SC Mixed 13.9
32% 11.3 GB/s
Latency 67.5
59% 67.5 ns
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 933 MHz
MC Read 22.6
MC Write 12.5
MC Mixed 18.1
51% 17.7 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 7.7
SC Mixed 12.2
30% 10.5 GB/s
Latency 49
82% 49 ns
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 933 MHz
MC Read 22.3
MC Write 14.6
MC Mixed 17.9
52% 18.3 GB/s
SC Read 10.4
SC Write 7.9
SC Mixed 12.6
29% 10.3 GB/s
Latency 64.3
62% 64.3 ns
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 933 MHz
MC Read 21.7
MC Write 13.8
MC Mixed 18
51% 17.8 GB/s
SC Read 8.9
SC Write 7.8
SC Mixed 10
25% 8.9 GB/s
Latency 69.8
57% 69.8 ns
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 933 MHz
MC Read 20.4
MC Write 14.1
MC Mixed 17.3
49% 17.3 GB/s
SC Read 9.7
SC Write 8.2
SC Mixed 12.2
29% 10 GB/s
Latency 68
59% 68 ns
5,554 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 15,162,745 RAM Kits tested.

Typical HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GB Builds (Compare 18,946 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-970A-DS3P - $79

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $354

Popular HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GB compatible motherboards:

How Fast Is Your RAM? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.
Memory Kit Rankings (Price vs Performance) March 2019 RAM Rankings.

We calculate effective RAM speed which measures performance for typical desktop users. Effective speed is adjusted by current cost per GB to yield value for money. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top Memory Kits. [RAMPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

Added n/a ago.

Excellent

12 months ago.

muy satisfecho, pues trabajo imagenes muy pesadas y con una sola placa se forzaba mucho los gráficos y el procesador, (ahora los gráficos andan bajos) pero es una pieza economica y necesaria, pues actualmente no tengo dinero para graficos (k2000)


Your
opinion?
105 Memory Kits (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list.

See how consistently different RAM Kits perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $380Nvidia GTX 1070 $330Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $104
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $120Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $220Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $105
Intel Core i5-8600K $260Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti $808Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $88
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $105SanDisk Extreme 64GB $43
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $716SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $120SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback