HP Z800 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics36.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive319% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory36GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 36GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP Z800 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 0AECh
Memory22.4 GB free of 36.002 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130715
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 19 '20 at 03:36
Run Duration218 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5550
CPU0 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
72.1% Very good
Memory 88.3
1-Core 77
2-Core 153
64% 106 Pts
4-Core 302
8-Core 577
52% 440 Pts
64-Core 583
36% 583 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 72.1%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 770-$279
Gigabyte(1458 3603) 2GB
CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 445.87
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
36.6% Below average
Lighting 43.7
Reflection 40.7
Parallax 56.7
36% 47 fps
MRender 55.4
Gravity 51
Splatting 38.4
38% 48.3 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 36.6%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Plextor M6e PCIe 512GB-$60
414GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.05 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 480 513 539 590 499 555 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
319% Outstanding
Read 2,951
Write 558
Mixed 1,230
SusWrite 529
287% 1,317 MB/s
4K Read 217
4K Write 81.9
4K Mixed 113
517% 137 MB/s
DQ Read 606
DQ Write 15.5
DQ Mixed 37.3
96% 220 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 319%
Great: 142%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$48
164GB free
Firmware: CC24
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 102 105 103 105 105 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
59.1% Above average
Read 103
Write 88.8
Mixed 69.5
SusWrite 103
67% 91.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.7
124% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 59.1%
Great: 114%
Seagate ST3000DM001-9YN166 2TB
680GB free
Firmware: CC27
SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 157 163 158 172 170 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
88.5% Excellent
Read 146
Write 81.5
Mixed 76
SusWrite 163
85% 116 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
165% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 88.5%
Great: 104%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$25
133GB free
Firmware: CC38
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 76 76 70 73 73 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
56% Above average
Read 121
Write 118
Mixed 68.2
SusWrite 73.5
70% 95.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1
174% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 56%
Great: 70%
USB DISK 3.0 496GB
355GB free, PID 6300
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.5 6.5 7 6.2 7.1 7.4 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
6.06% Terrible
Read 26.4
Write 9.5
Mixed 5.2
SusWrite 6.9
13% 12 MB/s
4K Read 3.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
12% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.06%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:02 9E CMX8GX3M2A1333C9 ID:80 AD HMT125U7BFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT125U7BFR8C-H9 ID:02 9E CMV4GX3M1A1333C9 ID:80 AD HMT125U7BFR8C-H9 ID:02 9E CMV4GX3M1A1333C9 ID:02 9E CMX8GX3M2A1333C9 ID:80 AD H... 70GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 2048, 2048, 4096, 2048, 4096, 4096, 2048, 2048, 4096, 2048, 4096, 34816 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
45.9% Average
MC Read 17.6
MC Write 17
MC Mixed 15.5
48% 16.7 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 8.3
SC Mixed 9
24% 8.33 GB/s
Latency 69.3
58% 69.3 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 45.9%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z800 Workstation Builds (Compare 1,969 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: HP Z800 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback