HP Compaq 8000 Elite CMT PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics0.56% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive64.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 8GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP Compaq 8000 Elite CMT PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 3647h
Memory6.4 GB free of 8.00391 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151014
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 19 '20 at 13:31
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Quad Q9550-$161
XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.85 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
52.2% Above average
Memory 76.7
1-Core 36.3
2-Core 81.1
43% 64.7 Pts
4-Core 163
8-Core 162
22% 162 Pts
64-Core 161
10% 161 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 52.2%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 8400 GS
Nvidia(10DE 0498) 256MB
Ram: 256MB, Driver: 342.01
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
0.56% Terrible
Lighting 0.73
Reflection 0.92
Parallax 0.34
1% 0.67 fps
MRender 0.71
Gravity 0.57
Splatting 0.57
0% 0.62 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.56%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 120GB 120GB
75GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 208 234 230 235 240 239 MB/s
Performing below potential (64th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
64.5% Good
Read 254
Write 234
Mixed 216
SusWrite 231
53% 234 MB/s
4K Read 27.1
4K Write 52.4
4K Mixed 29.3
106% 36.3 MB/s
DQ Read 166
DQ Write 167
DQ Mixed 139
112% 157 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 64.5%
Great: 81%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:80 CE M378B5273DH0-CH9 ID:02 FE EBJ21UE8BDF0-DJ-F ID:80 2C 8JTF12864AY-1G1D1 ID:80 2C 8JTF12864AY-1G1D1 44GB
1333, 1333, 1066, 1066, 0 MHz
4096, 2048, 1024, 1024, 36864 MB
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
22.1% Poor
MC Read 7.7
MC Write 6.5
MC Mixed 6.4
20% 6.87 GB/s
SC Read 6.4
SC Write 6.6
SC Mixed 7
19% 6.67 GB/s
Latency 86.9
46% 86.9 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 22.1%
Great: 22%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq 8000 Elite CMT PC Builds (Compare 321 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq 8000 Elite CMT PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 47% - Average Total price: $117
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback