Asrock EP2C602

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 76%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 82%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics103% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive78.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock EP2C602  (all builds)
Memory60.3 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131209
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 20 '20 at 08:37
Run Duration228 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 0
CPUSocket, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
69.3% Good
Memory 81.8
1-Core 76.2
2-Core 154
62% 104 Pts
4-Core 307
8-Core 602
54% 454 Pts
64-Core 1,487
92% 1,487 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 69.3%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$499
MSI(1462 360A) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 442.59
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
103% Outstanding
Lighting 121
Reflection 171
Parallax 184
98% 159 fps
MRender 124
Gravity 180
Splatting 123
115% 143 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 103%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$110
253GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 276 270 271 257 264 207 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
78.6% Very good
Read 458
Write 373
Mixed 386
SusWrite 258
83% 369 MB/s
4K Read 25.2
4K Write 33.5
4K Mixed 30.5
95% 29.7 MB/s
DQ Read 357
DQ Write 304
DQ Mixed 319
242% 327 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 78.6%
Great: 133%
ev Reader Atomos 512GB
26GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 301 301 302 297 298 298 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
63.1% Good
Read 332
Write 312
Mixed 164
SusWrite 299
62% 277 MB/s
4K Read 22.7
4K Write 28.6
4K Mixed 24.8
81% 25.4 MB/s
DQ Read 143
DQ Write 133
DQ Mixed 94.2
83% 123 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 63.1%
Great: 69%
Sandisk S31024G 1TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: X6107000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 294 306 307 302 295 323 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
73.7% Very good
Read 379
Write 183
Mixed 292
SusWrite 304
65% 290 MB/s
4K Read 17.1
4K Write 33.7
4K Mixed 27.7
79% 26.2 MB/s
DQ Read 363
DQ Write 298
DQ Mixed 263
215% 308 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 73.7%
Great: 121%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$110
1TB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 126 125 127 125 125 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
66.3% Good
Read 105
Write 94.3
Mixed 60.3
SusWrite 125
71% 96.2 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.1
216% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 66.3%
Great: 100%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$110
427GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 147 150 149 150 149 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
74.2% Very good
Read 110
Write 104
Mixed 76.2
SusWrite 149
81% 110 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
197% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 74.2%
Great: 100%
Seagate Barracuda 6TB (2017)-$140
3TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 120 124 124 123 123 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
67.8% Good
Read 114
Write 126
Mixed 66
SusWrite 121
78% 107 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 4.3
4K Mixed 0.8
239% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 67.8%
Great: 87%
WD Game Drive 8TB
3.5TB free, PID 2631
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 209 204 205 208 207 202 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 196
Write 203
Mixed 134
SusWrite 206
251% 185 MB/s
4K Read 3.2
4K Write 9.3
4K Mixed 1.6
383% 4.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1
DQ Write 5.7
DQ Mixed 2
266% 2.9 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 103%
Great: 120%
WD My Passport 25E2 4TB
419GB free, PID 25e2
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 62 63 62 63 62 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
47.4% Average
Read 74.2
Write 61.5
Mixed 53.8
SusWrite 62.5
84% 63 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 7.4
4K Mixed 0.8
283% 3.07 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 47.4%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9965426-412.A 8x8GB
8 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
94.4% Outstanding
MC Read 42.6
MC Write 38.4
MC Mixed 34.4
110% 38.5 GB/s
SC Read 12
SC Write 5.6
SC Mixed 7
23% 8.2 GB/s
Latency 77.3
52% 77.3 ns
Poor: 89%
This bench: 94.4%
Great: 94%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EP2C602 Builds (Compare 39 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 68%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 75%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asrock EP2C602

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 123% - Outstanding Total price: $200
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $120
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback