Acer, Aspire 5920G

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.14% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer, Aspire 5920G  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer, Chapala
Memory2.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20071121
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateApr 25 '20 at 05:28
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 25%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo T7700-$100
U2E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
37.6% Below average
Memory 69.2
1-Core 28.3
2-Core 41.6
34% 46.4 Pts
4-Core 37
8-Core 49.6
6% 43.3 Pts
64-Core 53.4
3% 53.4 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 37.6%
Great: 43%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3400
Acer(1025 0121) 256MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.7000
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
0.14% Terrible
Lighting 0.07
Reflection 1.04
Parallax 0.22
0% 0.44 fps
MRender 0.67
Gravity 0.17
Splatting 0.35
0% 0.39 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.14%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung HM320JI 320GB
202GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2SS00_01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 34 34 37 35 37 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
11.7% Very poor
Read 5.5
Write 42.9
Mixed 8
SusWrite 35.3
17% 22.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.2
32% 0.2 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 11.7%
Great: 36%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR2
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
14.7% Very poor
MC Read 5.8
MC Write 3.5
MC Mixed 3.8
12% 4.37 GB/s
SC Read 4.8
SC Write 3.4
SC Mixed 4
12% 4.07 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 14.7%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire 5920G Builds (Compare 41 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Acer, Aspire 5920G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 35% - Below average Total price: $180
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback