Asus TUF B360M-PLUS GAMING S

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 57%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics67.1% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive36.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF B360M-PLUS GAMING S  (all builds)
Memory1.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190604
Uptime2 Days
Run DateApr 26 '20 at 09:37
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU9%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400F-$85
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
86.1% Excellent
Memory 83.2
1-Core 126
2-Core 252
85% 153 Pts
4-Core 496
8-Core 602
71% 549 Pts
64-Core 513
32% 513 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 86.1%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$209
Asus(1043 86CC) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 441.20
Performing below potential (40th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
67.1% Good
Lighting 87.3
Reflection 82.1
Parallax 71.8
71% 80.4 fps
MRender 68.5
Gravity 73.8
Splatting 73.7
59% 72 fps
Poor: 62%
This bench: 67.1%
Great: 73%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apacer AS350 256GB
92GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0920A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 47 47 40 48 34 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
36.8% Below average
Read 372
Write 86.7
Mixed 53
SusWrite 42.3
30% 138 MB/s
4K Read 24.7
4K Write 37.7
4K Mixed 1.6
59% 21.3 MB/s
DQ Read 147
DQ Write 4.9
DQ Mixed 40.3
38% 64 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 36.8%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Apacer GD2.15278S.004 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
31% Below average
MC Read 13.3
MC Write 9
MC Mixed 9.4
30% 10.6 GB/s
SC Read 5.2
SC Write 6.4
SC Mixed 8.8
19% 6.8 GB/s
Latency 74.8
53% 74.8 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 31%
Great: 40%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF B360M-PLUS GAMING S Builds (Compare 1,363 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus TUF B360M-PLUS GAMING S - $113

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $486
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback