Today's hottest deals

Fujitsu CELSIUS M720 POWER

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics17.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory44GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 44GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
SystemFujitsu CELSIUS M720 POWER  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU D3128-A1
Memory37.4 GB free of 44 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20121211
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 29 '20 at 07:24
Run Duration200 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-1650 0-$230
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
66.6% Good
Memory 75.5
1-Core 83.4
2-Core 162
62% 107 Pts
4-Core 311
8-Core 539
52% 425 Pts
64-Core 691
43% 691 Pts
Poor: 65%
This bench: 66.6%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 560 Ti-$188
Asus(1043 838B) 1GB
CLim: 830 MHz, MLim: 1002 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 354.45
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
17.5% Very poor
Lighting 20.5
Reflection 23.8
Parallax 18.3
17% 20.9 fps
MRender 26.4
Gravity 21.5
Splatting 22.2
19% 23.4 fps
Poor: 15%
This bench: 17.5%
Great: 18%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston HyperX 3K 240GB-$70
48GB free (System drive)
Firmware: BBF0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 305
Write 207
Mixed 262
57% 258 MB/s
4K Read 23.9
4K Write 52.2
4K Mixed 28.8
101% 35 MB/s
DQ Read 292
DQ Write 194
DQ Mixed 163
143% 216 MB/s
Poor: 59% Great: 94%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$33
182GB free
Firmware: 1A01
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 126
Write 95
Mixed 89
78% 104 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
154% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 52% Great: 109%
Seagate IronWolf 8TB (2016)-$183
260GB free
Firmware: SC61
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 132 138 114 146 140 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 27% Great: 98%
General UDisk 8GB
7GB free, PID null
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 13.3
Write 3
Mixed 2.5
6% 6.27 MB/s
4K Read 7.9
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
29% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 3% Great: 10%
ST2000LM003 HN-M 2TB
359GB free, PID 1068
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 32
Write 27.3
Mixed 28
37% 29.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
101% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 13% Great: 32%
Seagate BUP BK 4TB
362GB free, PID ab28
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 97.5
Write 98.3
Mixed 55
104% 83.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 0.6
192% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 15% Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M391B1G73BH0- M391B1G73BH0- M391B1G73BH0- M391B1G73BH0- Hynix HMT325U7CFR8A Hynix HMT325U7CFR8A M378B5173QH0- M378B5173QH0- 44GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 2048, 2048, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
71.7% Very good
MC Read 30.4
MC Write 27.4
MC Mixed 26.3
80% 28 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 10.4
SC Mixed 9.9
31% 11 GB/s
Latency 89.3
45% 89.3 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 71.7%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CELSIUS M720 POWER Builds (Compare 34 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard

System: Fujitsu CELSIUS M720 POWER

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $474
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback