Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 91%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 106%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics101% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive144% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory58.8 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191119
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 29 '20 at 21:56
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$375
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
87.8% Excellent
Memory 69.9
1-Core 142
2-Core 284
88% 165 Pts
4-Core 564
8-Core 1,120
100% 842 Pts
64-Core 2,146
133% 2,146 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 87.8%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Pro W5700
AMD(1002 031E) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.4.2
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Lighting 122
Reflection 109
Parallax 202
100% 144 fps
MRender 103
Gravity 116
Splatting 150
104% 123 fps
Poor: 85%
This bench: 101%
Great: 101%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial P1 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$88
205GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P3CR013 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 99 97 114 109 99 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
144% Outstanding
Read 1,508
Write 152
Mixed 188
SusWrite 102
104% 488 MB/s
4K Read 60.3
4K Write 67.4
4K Mixed 55.1
198% 60.9 MB/s
DQ Read 681
DQ Write 82.7
DQ Mixed 126
157% 297 MB/s
Poor: 130%
This bench: 144%
Great: 295%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 4x16GB-$127
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
77.4% Very good
MC Read 30.4
MC Write 27.5
MC Mixed 27.8
82% 28.6 GB/s
SC Read 19
SC Write 17.8
SC Mixed 26.8
61% 21.2 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 77.4%
Great: 135%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 26,181 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $188

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $991
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback