Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 42% Speed boat	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	0.59% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	30.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	5GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 5GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3 M 370-$167 23,407 User benchmarks, average bench 39% CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	44.3% Average	Memory 63.8 1-Core 60.1 2-Core 90.9 45% 71.6 Pts	4-Core 146 8-Core 149 20% 147 Pts	64-Core 148 9% 148 Pts
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 44.3% Great: 45%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz) 99,513 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Acer(1025 036D) 2.2GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2900 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	0.59% Terrible	Lighting 0.63 Reflection 0.81 Parallax 0.62 0% 0.69 fps	MRender 1.05 Gravity 0.5 Splatting 1.04 1% 0.86 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.59% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$41 156,194 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 166GB free (System drive) Firmware: UF50 SusWrite @10s intervals: 178 132 136 141 140 158 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	30.1% Below average	Read 166 Write 185 Mixed 151 SusWrite 147 37% 162 MB/s	4K Read 11.3 4K Write 13.8 4K Mixed 9.4 36% 11.5 MB/s	DQ Read 102 DQ Write 46.1 DQ Mixed 28.6 33% 59.1 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 30.1% Great: 55%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown M471B5273DH0-CH9 M471B2873FHS-CH9 5GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 21% 1067, 1067 MHz 4096, 1024 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	22.6% Poor	MC Read 7.6 MC Write 6.3 MC Mixed 9.2 22% 7.7 GB/s	SC Read 5.3 SC Write 5.2 SC Mixed 6.4 16% 5.63 GB/s	Latency 117 34% 117 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 22.6% Great: 23%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 37%

Jet ski

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Pentium P6100IntelBench 35%, 6,283 samples	3x
Pentium P6000IntelBench 35%, 1,079 samples	2x
Core i3 M 350Intel $199Bench 38%, 14,351 samples	1x

GPU
HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 99,513 samples	7x

SSD
120G 120GBHs-ssd-c100Bench 66%, 4,962 samples	1x
Burst Elite 120GBPatriotBench 67%, 2,148 samples	1x

RAM
SH564568FH8NZPHSCR SH564568FJ8NZRNSDR 4GBUnknownBench 28%, 24 samples	1x
SH564568FJ8NZRNSDR 4GBUnknownBench 34%, 29 samples	1x
M471B2873FHS-CH9 2x1GBSamsungBench 20%, 123 samples	1x