Today's hottest deals

Asus X200CA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 24%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 22.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.03% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive48.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 44% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemAsus X200CA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X200CA
Memory2.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130918
Uptime12.9 Days
Run DateMay 01 '20 at 16:25
Run Duration168 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 100%
CPU Throttled 44%

 PC Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium 2117U
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 0.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
22.8% Poor
Memory 38.5
1-Core 21.6
2-Core 38.1
22% 32.7 Pts
4-Core 43
8-Core 43.4
6% 43.2 Pts
64-Core 42.2
3% 42.2 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 22.8%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (G3 Pentium/Celeron 1.0/1.1 GHz)
Asus(1043 138D) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
1.03% Terrible
Lighting 0.93
Reflection 1.19
Parallax 1.12
1% 1.08 fps
MRender 2.1
Gravity 0.8
Splatting 2.57
2% 1.82 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.03%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Mushkin MKNSSDTR500GB-3DX 500GB
351GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0201ANR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 275 271 328 368 334 376 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
48.6% Average
Read 294
Write 322
Mixed 268
SusWrite 326
68% 302 MB/s
4K Read 12.6
4K Write 17.7
4K Mixed 14
46% 14.8 MB/s
DQ Read 61.5
DQ Write 49.6
DQ Mixed 47.6
38% 52.9 MB/s
Poor: 85%
This bench: 48.6%
Great: 127%
Lexar USB Flash Drive 128GB
72GB free, PID a838, Lexar
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 39 51 50 48 67 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
14.8% Very poor
Read 20.3
Write 22.4
Mixed 24.4
SusWrite 48.4
42% 28.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.8
43% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 14.8%
Great: 37%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT451S6MFR6C-PB 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
14.3% Very poor
MC Read 6.2
MC Write 4.8
MC Mixed 3
13% 4.67 GB/s
SC Read 5.2
SC Write 4.4
SC Mixed 4.9
14% 4.83 GB/s
Latency 210
19% 210 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 14.3%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X200CA Builds (Compare 77 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Asus X200CA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback