Today's hottest deals

HP Z600 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.19% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive29.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP Z600 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 0B54h
Memory8.1 GB free of 12.002 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130715
Uptime2.6 Days
Run DateMay 02 '20 at 04:02
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5506
CPU0 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 1.95 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
45.3% Average
Memory 53.4
1-Core 50.4
2-Core 100
41% 68.1 Pts
4-Core 201
8-Core 400
36% 300 Pts
64-Core 398
25% 398 Pts
Poor: 41%
This bench: 45.3%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro FX 380
Nvidia(10DE 063B) 256MB
Ram: 256MB, Driver: 342.01
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.19% Terrible
Lighting 1.07
Reflection 2.12
Parallax 0.38
1% 1.19 fps
MRender 3.9
Gravity 0.7
Splatting 2.17
2% 2.26 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.19%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU630 240GB
92GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V8X01c83
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 30 17 23 19 22 MB/s
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
29.7% Poor
Read 232
Write 31
Mixed 57
SusWrite 21.5
18% 85.2 MB/s
4K Read 13.8
4K Write 26.5
4K Mixed 12
50% 17.4 MB/s
DQ Read 143
DQ Write 34.8
DQ Mixed 39
42% 72.3 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 29.7%
Great: 101%
SanDisk Ultra 123GB
28GB free, PID 558a
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 19 14 13 14 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
13.5% Very poor
Read 30.2
Write 19
Mixed 20.7
SusWrite 16.2
28% 21.5 MB/s
4K Read 4
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 1.3
110% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 13.5%
Great: 33%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:02 FE EBJ21EE8BDFA-DJ-F ID:80 AD HMT325U6BFR8C-H9 ID:02 FE EBJ21UE8BDF0-DJ-F ID:83 0B NT2GC64B88B0NF-CG ID:80 AD HMT325U6BFR8C-H9 ID:02 FE EBJ21EE8BDFA-DJ-F 46GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 34816 MB
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
33% Below average
MC Read 14.4
MC Write 11.8
MC Mixed 10.8
35% 12.3 GB/s
SC Read 8.3
SC Write 5.5
SC Mixed 6.5
19% 6.77 GB/s
Latency 149
27% 149 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 33%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z600 Workstation Builds (Compare 2,218 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard

System: HP Z600 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Excellent Total price: $84
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback