MSI MS-1771

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.74% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive74.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (41%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemMicro-Star GS70 2OD
MotherboardMSI MS-1771  (all builds)
Memory11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131203
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 02 '20 at 15:49
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 41%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4200H
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 1.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
42.8% Average
Memory 71.9
1-Core 26.7
2-Core 56.3
36% 51.6 Pts
4-Core 82.4
8-Core 86.3
11% 84.4 Pts
64-Core 86.1
5% 86.1 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 42.8%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
MSI(1462 10EE) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4835
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
3.74% Terrible
Lighting 3.93
Reflection 14.5
Parallax 6.25
3% 8.21 fps
MRender 6.62
Gravity 2.33
Splatting 7.83
5% 5.59 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.74%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
428GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 311 237 353 301 380 385 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
74.4% Very good
Read 386
Write 382
Mixed 272
SusWrite 328
77% 342 MB/s
4K Read 21.5
4K Write 45.1
4K Mixed 26.2
90% 30.9 MB/s
DQ Read 289
DQ Write 206
DQ Mixed 241
182% 246 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 74.4%
Great: 134%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905428-417.A00LF MSI16D3LS1KBG/8G 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
34.9% Below average
MC Read 11.9
MC Write 13.5
MC Mixed 12.1
36% 12.5 GB/s
SC Read 8.2
SC Write 7
SC Mixed 7.6
22% 7.6 GB/s
Latency 97.1
41% 97.1 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 34.9%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-1771 Builds (Compare 97 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-1771

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $370
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $158
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback