Asus P8P67 LE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics34% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive24.5% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsus P8P67 LE  (all builds)
Memory7.3 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110211
Uptime2 Days
Run DateMay 02 '20 at 18:56
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 28%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-2100-$49
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
53.7% Above average
Memory 83.5
1-Core 66.8
2-Core 111
56% 87 Pts
4-Core 140
8-Core 148
19% 144 Pts
64-Core 146
9% 146 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 53.7%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 770-$279
Asus(1043 8465) 2GB
CLim: 1215 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 441.66
Performing below potential (62nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
34% Below average
Lighting 40.6
Reflection 37.3
Parallax 49.6
33% 42.5 fps
MRender 53.1
Gravity 46.6
Splatting 35.2
36% 44.9 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 34%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk S128G 126GB
41GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 54 72 45 45 39 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
24.5% Poor
Read 247
Write 87.3
Mixed 47.8
SusWrite 54.9
24% 109 MB/s
4K Read 11.7
4K Write 11.7
4K Mixed 8.7
35% 10.7 MB/s
DQ Read 13.5
DQ Write 14.6
DQ Mixed 13.4
10% 13.8 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 24.5%
Great: 56%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
832GB free
Firmware: JC4B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 84 95 92 100 104 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
58.3% Above average
Read 108
Write 105
Mixed 59.8
SusWrite 95.4
68% 92 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.9
153% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 58.3%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Corsair CMX4GX3M2A1600C9 Corsair CMX4GX3M2A1600C9 12GB
1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
33.6% Below average
MC Read 10.7
MC Write 11.7
MC Mixed 10.5
31% 11 GB/s
SC Read 9.3
SC Write 11.6
SC Mixed 9.9
29% 10.3 GB/s
Latency 74.3
54% 74.3 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 33.6%
Great: 34%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8P67 LE Builds (Compare 1,250 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus P8P67 LE - $113

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $639
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $153
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback