Acer Aspire 1410

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 21%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.25% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAcer Aspire 1410  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer JM11-MS
Memory1.8 GB free of 3 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1024 x 600 - 32 Bit colori, 1024 x 600 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100831
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 04 '20 at 08:53
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron 743
CPU, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads
Base clock 1.3 GHz, turbo 1.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
33.5% Below average
Memory 64.5
1-Core 18.4
2-Core 18.6
28% 33.8 Pts
4-Core 18.6
8-Core 18.5
2% 18.5 Pts
64-Core 18.5
1% 18.5 Pts
Poor: 10%
This bench: 33.5%
Great: 34%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Mobile Series 4 Express Chipset Family
Acer(1025 029B) 1.2GB
Driver: igdumd32.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2702
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.25% Terrible
Lighting 0.33
Reflection 0.27
Parallax 0.22
0% 0.27 fps
MRender 0.29
Gravity 0.33
Splatting 0.22
0% 0.28 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.25%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST9160314AS 160GB
138GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 31 29 27 46 52 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
26.2% Poor
Read 52.7
Write 57.3
Mixed 32.7
SusWrite 38.5
33% 45.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
119% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 26.2%
Great: 36%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
AD HYMP112S64CP6-S6 7F7FFE EBE21UE8AFSA-8G-F 3GB
800, 800 MHz
1024, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
13.1% Very poor
MC Read 4.6
MC Write 3.9
MC Mixed 3.8
12% 4.1 GB/s
SC Read 2.1
SC Write 3.8
SC Mixed 1.7
7% 2.53 GB/s
Latency 115
35% 115 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 13.1%
Great: 19%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire 1410 Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 30%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire 1410

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback