ADD TO PC
BUILD

HP Z400_v2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 35% Jet ski	Desktop 79% Battleship	Workstation 30% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	45.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	HP Z400_v2 (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 0B4Ch
Memory	8.2 GB free of 20.002 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180305
Uptime	1.8 Days
Run Date	May 04 '20 at 09:05
Run Duration	183 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	10%

PC Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon W3680-$180 6,658 User benchmarks, average bench 75% CPU0 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.35 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	80.1% Excellent	Memory 93.2 1-Core 97.1 2-Core 195 75% 128 Pts	4-Core 362 8-Core 576 58% 469 Pts	64-Core 684 42% 684 Pts
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 80.1% Great: 83%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 470-$126 94,030 User benchmarks, average bench 40% Asus(1043 04B0) CLim: 1250 MHz, MLim: 1650 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.1.3 Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	45.3% Average	Lighting 55.3 Reflection 64.3 Parallax 74 45% 64.5 fps	MRender 61.1 Gravity 55.9 Splatting 52.3 46% 56.4 fps
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 45.3% Great: 47%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$75 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 151GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT04B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 3,449 Write 3,101 Mixed 3,223 727% 3,258 MB/s	4K Read 218 4K Write 123 4K Mixed 125 555% 155 MB/s	DQ Read 524 DQ Write 363 DQ Mixed 412 316% 433 MB/s
Poor: 74% Great: 129%
WD Gold 4TB (2016)-$183 4,829 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 880GB free Firmware: 01.01M03 SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 153 148 145 153 153 MB/s Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	98.2% Outstanding	Read 192 Write 195 Mixed 73.5 SusWrite 150 111% 152 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 4.5 4K Mixed 0.7 199% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 98.2% Great: 111%
WD Blue 640GB (2008)-$33 94,563 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 963GB free Firmware: 01.03B01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 94 93 93 93 93 MB/s Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	54.7% Above average	Read 97.2 Write 93.8 Mixed 58.5 SusWrite 92.9 63% 85.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 1 183% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 54.7% Great: 62%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$62 462,780 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 869GB free Firmware: CC26 SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 153 152 154 154 154 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	85.5% Excellent	Read 146 Write 124 Mixed 71.5 SusWrite 152 90% 123 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.8 150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 85.5% Great: 114%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown ID:80 AD HMT351U7BFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT351U7BFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT351U7BFR8C-H9 ID:85 02 1600EL Series ID:80 AD HMT351U7BFR8C-H9 ID:85 02 1600EL Series 54GB 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 2048, 4096, 2048, 34816 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	38.9% Below average	MC Read 13 MC Write 13.8 MC Mixed 12.2 37% 13 GB/s	SC Read 10.1 SC Write 8.6 SC Mixed 10.9 28% 9.87 GB/s	Latency 61.6 65% 61.6 ns

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Typical Z400_v2 Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming

Gaming 0%

Incomplete

Desktop

Desktop 0%

Incomplete

Workstation

Workstation 0%

Incomplete

System: HP Z400_v2

CPU
Xeon W3565IntelBench 67%, 7,121 samples	1x

GPU
R7 250AMDBench 8%, 25,802 samples	1x

RAM
ID:83 0B NT2GC64B88B0NF-CG ID:01 98 9965525-085.A00LF 40GBUnknownBench 28%, 1 sample	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168	Nvidia RTX 4070 $490	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback