Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 121%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 113%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics121% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive164% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory7.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit 色彩
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210616
Uptime2.8 Days
Run DateFeb 14 '22 at 16:10
Run Duration176 Seconds
Run User HKG-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$105
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
99.4% Outstanding
Memory 88.5
1-Core 166
2-Core 315
103% 190 Pts
4-Core 593
8-Core 956
95% 775 Pts
64-Core 1,155
72% 1,155 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 99.4%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$397
Asus(1043 87C8) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 511.65
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
121% Outstanding
Lighting 164
Reflection 163
Parallax 165
134% 164 fps
MRender 179
Gravity 127
Splatting 109
110% 138 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 121%
Great: 136%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SNVS1000G 1TB
212GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EDFK5N09
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1275 820 67 63 227 233 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
164% Outstanding
Read 998
Write 1,506
Mixed 1,115
SusWrite 447
230% 1,017 MB/s
4K Read 40.5
4K Write 131
4K Mixed 54.4
201% 75.4 MB/s
DQ Read 631
DQ Write 937
DQ Mixed 582
497% 717 MB/s
Poor: 106%
This bench: 164%
Great: 246%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
22GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 397
Write 406
Mixed 320
84% 374 MB/s
4K Read 33.4
4K Write 85.9
4K Mixed 53
164% 57.4 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 362
DQ Mixed 367
277% 371 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
WD Gold 4TB (2016)-$110
942GB free
Firmware: 01.01M02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 109 117 113 109 112 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
61.4% Good
Read 101
Write 99.9
Mixed 58.6
SusWrite 112
68% 92.8 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 5.1
4K Mixed 0.6
203% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 61.4%
Great: 111%
Toshiba MG08ADA800E 8TB
4.5TB free
Firmware: 4302
SusWrite @10s intervals: 207 214 219 214 215 214 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 66% Great: 141%
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$80
141GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 123 120 115 113 124 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
68.8% Good
Read 119
Write 117
Mixed 80.2
SusWrite 120
80% 109 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 0.8
182% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 68.8%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4-3000C15-8GTZR F4-3200C16-8GTZN 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
87.5% Excellent
MC Read 35.9
MC Write 23.7
MC Mixed 33.1
88% 30.9 GB/s
SC Read 27.9
SC Write 23.5
SC Mixed 34
81% 28.5 GB/s
Latency 69.1
58% 69.1 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS Builds (Compare 3,742 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 143%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $621
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback