Samsung 300E5EV/300E4EV/270E5EV/270E4EV/2470EV/2470EE

Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 40% Jet ski	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	3.65% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	38.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 48% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

Run History

4 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Samsung 300E5EV/300E4EV/270E5EV/270E4EV/2470EV/2470EE (all builds)
Motherboard	SAMSUNG NP300E5V-S02IN
Memory	4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140828
Uptime	0.5 Days
Run Date	May 04 '20 at 23:57
Run Duration	127 Seconds
Run User	JPN-User
Background CPU	15%
CPU Throttled	48%

PC Performing as expected (47^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-3120M-$100 14,372 User benchmarks, average bench 50% CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 1.2 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	40.3% Average	Memory 67 1-Core 32.9 2-Core 50.2 36% 50 Pts	4-Core 81.8 8-Core 82.3 11% 82.1 Pts	64-Core 81.8 5% 81.8 Pts
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 40.3% Great: 59%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz) FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Sanyo(144D C708) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.5100 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	3.65% Terrible	Lighting 4.07 Reflection 5.35 Parallax 2.94 3% 4.12 fps	MRender 4.86 Gravity 2.23 Splatting 7.7 4% 4.93 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.65% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Crucial BX500 240GB-$25 142,801 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 178GB free (System drive) Firmware: M6CR013 SusWrite @10s intervals: 369 150 154 163 170 139 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	38.7% Below average	Read 456 Write 390 Mixed 12.3 SusWrite 191 58% 262 MB/s	4K Read 11.8 4K Write 5.8 4K Mixed 6.6 29% 8.07 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 38.7% Great: 92%
Toshiba MQ01ABD075 750GB-$40 42,694 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 259GB free Firmware: AX001F SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 95 96 95 95 95 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	55.6% Above average	Read 98.7 Write 95.5 Mixed 34.2 SusWrite 95.1 59% 80.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.7 124% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 55.6% Great: 57%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5273EB0-CK0 Kingston 9905469-157.A00LF 8GB 11 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	33.5% Below average	MC Read 11.7 MC Write 11.9 MC Mixed 13.3 35% 12.3 GB/s	SC Read 5.9 SC Write 6.1 SC Mixed 7 18% 6.33 GB/s	Latency 109 37% 109 ns
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 33.5% Great: 51%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 300E5EV/300E4EV/270E5EV/270E4EV/2470EV/2470EE Builds (Compare 281 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 49%

Yacht

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Samsung 300E5EV/300E4EV/270E5EV/270E4EV/2470EV/2470EE

CPU
Core i3-3120MIntel $100Bench 50%, 14,372 samples	85x
Core i5-3230MIntel $100Bench 49%, 61,311 samples	78x
Core i3-3110MIntel $70Bench 48%, 34,445 samples	37x

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	190x
HD Graphics (G3 Pentium/Celeron 1.0/1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 28,701 samples	40x
HD Graphics (G2 Pentium/Celeron 1.1/1.15 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 45,735 samples	35x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	14x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	10x
MX500 250GBCrucial $39Bench 101%, 77,177 samples	6x

RAM
M471B5273CH0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 26%, 3,608 samples	25x
M471B5273CH0-YK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 46%, 2,928 samples	23x
M471B5273EB0-CK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 51%, 5,979 samples	21x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 57% - Above average

Total price: $128

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363