Today's hottest deals

Asrock N68-S3 FX

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics49.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsrock N68-S3 FX  (all builds)
Memory5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120604
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateFeb 06 '17 at 00:17
Run Duration212 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-6300-$90
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
64.4% Good
Memory 84.7
1-Core 68.4
2-Core 121
57% 91.3 Pts
4-Core 244
8-Core 322
36% 283 Pts
64-Core 324
20% 324 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 64.4%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
Ram: 4GB, Driver: 344.48
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
49.5% Average
Lighting 60.7
Reflection 67.3
Parallax 59.9
50% 62.6 fps
MRender 72.2
Gravity 58.3
Splatting 54.1
50% 61.6 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 49.5%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$30
136GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC49
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
71% Very good
Read 126
Write 122
Mixed 116
91% 121 MB/s
4K Read 0.47
4K Write 1.77
4K Mixed 0.22
77% 0.82 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 71%
Great: 112%
Mass Storage Device 16GB
2GB free, PID 125c
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
16.2% Very poor
Read 68.1
Write 9.02
Mixed 9.38
25% 28.8 MB/s
4K Read 3.14
4K Write 1.17
4K Mixed 0.96
84% 1.76 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 16.2%
Great: 16%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5584-003.A00LF KHX1600C10D3/4G 8GB
333, 333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
46.3% Average
MC Read 19.8
MC Write 14.6
MC Mixed 15.3
47% 16.6 GB/s
SC Read 10
SC Write 8.9
SC Mixed 11.3
29% 10.1 GB/s
Latency 72.2
55% 72.2 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 46.3%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical N68-S3 FX Builds (Compare 108 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock N68-S3 FX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $77
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback