Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 66% Battle cruiser	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	1.05% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	81.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

PC Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2400-$250 166,255 User benchmarks, average bench 61% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	74.2% Very good	Memory 90.8 1-Core 88 2-Core 175 70% 118 Pts	4-Core 336 8-Core 332 45% 334 Pts	64-Core 334 21% 334 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 74.2% Great: 70%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz) 150,891 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Fijitsu Siemens(1734 11B9) 1.2GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4229 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.05% Terrible	Lighting 1.1 Reflection 1.46 Parallax 1 1% 1.19 fps	MRender 1.9 Gravity 0.8 Splatting 2.04 1% 1.58 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.05% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SSDPR-CL100-120- 120GB 18 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 77GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1A SusWrite @10s intervals: 397 389 409 391 375 255 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	81.5% Excellent	Read 458 Write 367 Mixed 328 SusWrite 369 85% 381 MB/s	4K Read 32.5 4K Write 52.8 4K Mixed 22 105% 35.8 MB/s	DQ Read 191 DQ Write 227 DQ Mixed 33.5 74% 151 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 81.5% Great: 81%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5773DH0-CH9 2x2GB 4,605 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 2 of 4 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	49.4% Average	MC Read 17.7 MC Write 17.3 MC Mixed 15.4 48% 16.8 GB/s	SC Read 13.9 SC Write 16 SC Mixed 14.5 42% 14.8 GB/s	Latency 66.2 60% 66.2 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 49.4% Great: 50%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 56%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	41x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	9x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	8x

SSD
PLUS 240GBSandiskBench 45%, 86,316 samples	4x
MX500 1TBCrucial $72Bench 106%, 202,785 samples	3x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	3x

RAM
HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 4x4GBKingstonBench 60%, 17,012 samples	3x
HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 4x4GBHynixBench 48%, 2,925 samples	3x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	2x

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $250