Notebook W35xSTQ_370ST

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics13.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive42.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemNotebook W35xSTQ_370ST  (all builds)
MotherboardNotebook W35xSTQ_370ST
Memory7.8 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130918
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 09 '20 at 20:57
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4700MQ-$209
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
72.5% Very good
Memory 81
1-Core 97.9
2-Core 189
71% 123 Pts
4-Core 350
8-Core 473
52% 412 Pts
64-Core 472
29% 472 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 72.5%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 765M
Clevo(1558 3537) 2GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 25.21.14.2531
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
13.5% Very poor
Lighting 16
Reflection 12.8
Parallax 17.4
13% 15.4 fps
MRender 18.3
Gravity 21
Splatting 14.7
14% 18 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 13.5%
Great: 14%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
140GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK
SusWrite @10s intervals: 290 55 12 25 115 12 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
42.4% Average
Read 485
Write 411
Mixed 398
SusWrite 85
77% 345 MB/s
4K Read 30.8
4K Write 9.6
4K Mixed 0.9
53% 13.8 MB/s
DQ Read 156
DQ Write 13.9
DQ Mixed 0.1
22% 56.8 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 42.4%
Great: 102%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Elpida EBJ81UG8BBU0-GN-F Samsung M471B5273CH0-CH9 12GB
1600, 1333 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
50.1% Above average
MC Read 17.9
MC Write 17.9
MC Mixed 15.7
49% 17.2 GB/s
SC Read 13.6
SC Write 17.4
SC Mixed 16.8
46% 15.9 GB/s
Latency 78.7
51% 78.7 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 50.1%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical W35xSTQ_370ST Builds (Compare 96 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Notebook W35xSTQ_370ST

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 38% - Below average Total price: $384
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback