Asus H110M-K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics43.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive73.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (52%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus H110M-K  (all builds)
Memory4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190625
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 14 '20 at 14:01
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU 52%
Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6600-$121
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
77.2% Very good
Memory 85.5
1-Core 114
2-Core 220
79% 140 Pts
4-Core 390
8-Core 441
54% 416 Pts
64-Core 418
26% 418 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 77.2%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75
CLim: 1266 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 17.1.1
Performing below potential (39th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
43.9% Average
Lighting 52.3
Reflection 64.8
Parallax 71.5
43% 62.9 fps
MRender 66.6
Gravity 51.6
Splatting 53.9
46% 57.4 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 43.9%
Great: 53%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
TOSHIBA-TR200 240GB
160GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFA12.4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 240 121 84 40 95 52 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
73.4% Very good
Read 315
Write 117
Mixed 259
SusWrite 106
44% 199 MB/s
4K Read 33.9
4K Write 82.4
4K Mixed 34.3
139% 50.2 MB/s
DQ Read 262
DQ Write 282
DQ Mixed 183
162% 242 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 73.4%
Great: 90%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$20
443GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 181 183 185 188 187 183 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 186
Write 170
Mixed 72.5
SusWrite 184
112% 153 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
163% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 106%
Great: 88%
WD Elements 25A3 5TB
1TB free, PID 25a3
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 119 119 119 119 119 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
52.4% Above average
Read 131
Write 132
Mixed 103
SusWrite 119
164% 121 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
119% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 52.4%
Great: 66%
Generic USB CF Reader 1GB
1GB free, PID 6362
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 14 14 14 14 13 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
5.84% Terrible
Read 12
Write 12.7
Mixed 11
SusWrite 13.5
17% 12.3 MB/s
4K Read 3.6
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.2
24% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 1%
This bench: 5.84%
Great: 6%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA41GU6AFR8N-TF 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
38.1% Below average
MC Read 13.8
MC Write 12.8
MC Mixed 11.5
36% 12.7 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 12.8
SC Mixed 10.2
32% 11.2 GB/s
Latency 71.6
56% 71.6 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 38.1%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H110M-K Builds (Compare 6,042 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus H110M-K

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $157
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback