Today's hottest deals

HP SG3-210es

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.46% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (64%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP SG3-210es  (all builds)
MotherboardFOXCONN 2AAF
Memory1.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100423
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateMay 15 '20 at 09:23
Run Duration230 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 64%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X2 220
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
47.2% Average
Memory 90.4
1-Core 11.6
2-Core 18.7
35% 40.2 Pts
4-Core 27.1
8-Core 38.2
4% 32.7 Pts
64-Core 26.3
2% 26.3 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 47.2%
Great: 47%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Radeon 3000 Graphics
HP(103C 2AA9) 256MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.46% Terrible
Lighting 0.5
Reflection 1.12
Parallax 0.16
0% 0.59 fps
MRender 0.81
Gravity 0.13
Splatting 1.04
1% 0.66 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.46%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung HD321HJ 320GB
229GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1AC0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.8 3.6 3.9 5.2 5.5 3.2 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
2.83% Terrible
Read 5.7
Write 4.7
Mixed 4.2
SusWrite 4.2
4% 4.7 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
0% 0 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 2.83%
Great: 64%
WD 5000AAC External 500GB
297GB free, PID 1003
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 21 20 17 17 18 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
12.4% Very poor
Read 16.6
Write 15.3
Mixed 17.5
SusWrite 18.7
24% 17 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
94% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12.4%
Great: 22%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT25664BD160BJ.C4F Samsung M378B5673FH0-CH9 4GB
1066, 1066 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
15.7% Very poor
MC Read 5.2
MC Write 3.4
MC Mixed 5.7
14% 4.77 GB/s
SC Read 0.3
SC Write 1.2
SC Mixed 1.5
3% 1 GB/s
Latency 66.7
60% 66.7 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 15.7%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $82
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback