Today's hottest deals

Asrock A320M-HDV R4.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 68%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (88th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 12 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics71.5% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive122% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock A320M-HDV R4.0  (all builds)
Memory12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191113
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 16 '20 at 02:00
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 1660 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$120
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
85.9% Excellent
Memory 88.5
1-Core 116
2-Core 230
82% 145 Pts
4-Core 448
8-Core 696
71% 572 Pts
64-Core 869
54% 869 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 85.9%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$209
PNY(196E 1325) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 445.87
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
71.5% Very good
Lighting 94.3
Reflection 85.8
Parallax 74.6
77% 84.9 fps
MRender 68.3
Gravity 78.2
Splatting 76.7
61% 74.4 fps
Poor: 62%
This bench: 71.5%
Great: 73%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate BarraCuda 120 SSD ZA500CM10003 500GB
122GB free (System drive)
Firmware: STRSD013
SusWrite @10s intervals: 459 478 395 405 402 405 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
122% Outstanding
Read 505
Write 491
Mixed 471
SusWrite 424
107% 473 MB/s
4K Read 42.2
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 57.5
192% 67.3 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 361
DQ Mixed 368
277% 369 MB/s
Poor: 89%
This bench: 122%
Great: 136%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 7EH67AA# 7EH67AA#ABC 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
112% Outstanding
MC Read 45
MC Write 41.5
MC Mixed 36.2
117% 40.9 GB/s
SC Read 26.3
SC Write 41.9
SC Mixed 30.9
94% 33 GB/s
Latency 69
58% 69 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 112%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A320M-HDV R4.0 Builds (Compare 6,193 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asrock A320M-HDV R4.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $355
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $68
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback