Acer Nitro AN515-42

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.97% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive64.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Nitro AN515-42  (all builds)
MotherboardRR Freed_RRS
Memory1.4 GB free of 12 GB @ 0 GHz
Display640 x 480 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181030
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateMay 16 '20 at 20:47
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User LTU-User
Background CPU 36%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.15 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
44.1% Average
Memory 59.5
1-Core 64.3
2-Core 82.2
44% 68.7 Pts
4-Core 156
8-Core 288
26% 222 Pts
64-Core 286
18% 286 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 44.1%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 (Ryzen iGPU)
Acer(1025 125C) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 20.4.2
Relative performance (0th percentile)
2.97% Terrible
Lighting 0.03
Reflection 9.62
Parallax 11.6
0% 7.09 fps
MRender 9.38
Gravity 9.73
Splatting 12
9% 10.4 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 2.97%
Great: 11%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 3D SATA M.2 250GB-$55
120GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X61190WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 208 195 194 195 191 192 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
64.6% Good
Read 383
Write 314
Mixed 144
SusWrite 196
58% 259 MB/s
4K Read 20.3
4K Write 37.7
4K Mixed 25
83% 27.7 MB/s
DQ Read 273
DQ Write 246
DQ Mixed 232
182% 250 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 64.6%
Great: 104%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB
635GB free
Firmware: JU001J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 138 138 137 135 137 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
79.3% Very good
Read 138
Write 122
Mixed 35.8
SusWrite 137
78% 108 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 5.5
4K Mixed 0.6
185% 2.17 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 79.3%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH Kingston KHX2133C13S4/4G 12GB
0, 0 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
50.1% Above average
MC Read 19.6
MC Write 19.3
MC Mixed 17.3
54% 18.7 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 12.6
SC Mixed 12.1
34% 11.7 GB/s
Latency 129
31% 129 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 50.1%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Nitro AN515-42 Builds (Compare 867 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Nitro AN515-42

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback