Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics13.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive60.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGigabyte A320M-S2H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF  (all builds)
Memory2.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191018
Uptime2.8 Days
Run DateMay 19 '20 at 21:34
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G-$60
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
62.2% Good
Memory 65.9
1-Core 97.7
2-Core 212
68% 125 Pts
4-Core 353
8-Core 259
43% 306 Pts
64-Core 275
17% 275 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 62.2%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 8 Graphics
AMD(1002 15D8) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.2.1
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
13.3% Very poor
Lighting 16.2
Reflection 15.9
Parallax 20.4
13% 17.5 fps
MRender 9.67
Gravity 16.6
Splatting 20.6
13% 15.6 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 13.3%
Great: 13%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU650 120GB-$14
54GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V8X01c45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 173 161 103 141 176 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
60.2% Good
Read 388
Write 238
Mixed 188
SusWrite 151
54% 241 MB/s
4K Read 17.4
4K Write 58.3
4K Mixed 27.1
92% 34.3 MB/s
DQ Read 139
DQ Write 168
DQ Mixed 127
103% 145 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 60.2%
Great: 88%
WDC WD20EZAZ-00GGJB0 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 164 168 166 166 168 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
19.8% Very poor
Read 177
Write 170
Mixed 86.7
SusWrite 166
34% 150 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 8.1
4K Mixed 0.7
8% 3.57 MB/s
DQ Read 0.7
DQ Write 10.6
DQ Mixed 1
2% 4.1 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 19.8%
Great: 23%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5713-003.A00G W6451U66J5213ND 8GB
2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
53.1% Above average
MC Read 19.8
MC Write 17.4
MC Mixed 20.3
55% 19.2 GB/s
SC Read 13.6
SC Write 14
SC Mixed 17.7
43% 15.1 GB/s
Latency 111
36% 111 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 53.1%
Great: 66%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-A320M-S2H-CF Builds (Compare 7,885 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF - $70

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $427
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $238Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback